Gate News Report, March 10 — Li Jian, the head of the Civil Trial Third Division of China’s Supreme People’s Court, revealed today that the Supreme Court is drafting relevant judicial policy documents aimed at clarifying two core issues: the criteria for determining the originality of AI-generated content and the legal nature of using others’ works for data training in large models. Currently, Chinese copyright law does not have detailed provisions regarding copyright protection for content generated by AI. Li Jian cited the so-called “Ultraman Case,” considered the first infringement case involving domestic AIGC, as an example. In this case, an AI painting platform was found to have long-standing infringement issues with numerous Ultraman images. In September 2024, the court ruled in the first instance that the platform cease infringement and pay 30,000 yuan in damages, clarifying that AI service providers should bear secondary liability for user infringements under specific circumstances. Li Jian stated that courts emphasize that service providers’ duty of care should align with their information management capabilities. Generative AI services are only subject to legal regulation when they violate the principles of good faith or disrupt market competition, thus leaving room for industry development. Tao Kaiyuan, Vice President of the Supreme Court, also said on March 5 that efforts are underway to draft judicial policy documents related to AI and data property rights, noting that “judges find it difficult to make rulings simply by matching current laws.” In 2024, courts at all levels accepted 908 cases involving data ownership and transaction disputes, a 25.6% increase year over year.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Galaxy Research Chief: U.S. OFAC Sanctions List Involves 518 Bitcoin Addresses
The U.S. Treasury's OFAC sanctions list includes 518 Bitcoin addresses that have significantly engaged in crypto transactions, currently holding about 9,306 BTC valued at $707 million, highlighting the relationship between cryptocurrency and financial regulation.
GateNews3h ago
SEC Crypto Shift Clarifies Rules Without Blanket Approval
The SEC has adopted a more lenient stance on crypto regulation, allowing some interfaces to operate without broker-dealer registration, but has not given blanket approval for the industry. Recent guidance clarifies how crypto assets are categorized, emphasizing that federal securities laws apply mainly to digital securities. Enforcement activity has decreased as the agency focuses on fraud and market integrity.
CryptoFrontier13h ago
Polish lawmakers want to overturn the president’s veto of the cryptocurrency bill but failed again in their latest attempt to push it through.
Poland’s parliament failed to override the president’s veto of the cryptocurrency regulatory bill, stalling the process of digital-asset legislation and making it one of the few countries in the EU that has not yet implemented the MiCA framework. Differences between the president and the government over the bill’s content led to a political stalemate, affecting market confidence and legal transparency.
ChainNewsAbmedia15h ago
Polish Parliament Fails to Override President's Veto on Crypto Law; PM Alleges Russian Interference
Polish lawmakers failed to override President Nawrocki's veto on a cryptocurrency regulation bill aimed at aligning with EU standards. Tensions rise as accusations emerge of Russian influence in a major crypto exchange amid liquidity issues and lack of regulation.
GateNews17h ago
White House Mediates Clarity Act Stablecoin Dispute, Witt Reveals Legislative Timeline
Patrick Witt announced at the Solana Policy Institute summit that the White House mediated a stablecoin dispute to advance the Clarity Act. The compromise allows banks and crypto firms to together address regulatory concerns, with future focus on crypto taxation and blockchain integration strategies among financial institutions.
GateNews23h ago
Hong Kong SFC Investment Committee Warns Prediction Market Trading May Constitute Illegal Gambling
The Hong Kong SFC warns that prediction markets are speculative and not investment products, lacking regulatory protection. They involve gambling elements, potentially making them illegal. The committee urges the public to differentiate between investment and gambling.
GateNews04-18 03:46
