Bitcoin ETF attracts $1.4 billion in five days, but BTC price remains stagnant—analysts reveal the underlying mechanism

BTC0,51%

On March 4th, news reports that U.S.-listed Bitcoin spot ETFs have recently experienced a significant influx of funds again. Data shows that over the past five days, related funds have attracted approximately $1.4 billion, but Bitcoin prices have not risen accordingly, and market prices continue to fluctuate within a relatively narrow range. This phenomenon has sparked discussions about whether ETF fund inflows necessarily drive BTC prices higher.

Analysts point out that the flow of funds into Bitcoin ETFs is not perfectly synchronized with spot market prices, which involves the operational structure of ETFs. An ETF is a pooled investment vehicle that tracks asset value by holding assets like Bitcoin and issuing shares that can be traded on securities markets. Since the approval of 11 Bitcoin spot ETFs in the U.S. in January 2024, total fund inflows have exceeded $55 billion, becoming a significant force influencing the crypto market.

During ETF operations, the creation and redemption of shares are primarily handled by authorized participants (APs), typically large banks, market makers, or brokers. When demand for ETFs increases, the fund shares may trade at a premium. APs create new shares and sell them to the market to maintain the balance between ETF prices and the fund’s net asset value (NAV).

However, in this process, APs often sell ETF shares they do not yet hold, effectively short-selling to meet market demand, and later buy the corresponding amount of Bitcoin to settle the position. This means that ETF fund inflows do not necessarily translate immediately into spot market Bitcoin purchases; actual buying may be delayed by hours or even longer.

This time lag can lead to a phenomenon: ETF size continues to grow, but the spot Bitcoin market lacks synchronized buying support in the short term. When actual Bitcoin purchases occur, other selling pressures in the market may also arise simultaneously, offsetting upward price movement and keeping Bitcoin prices volatile.

Market observers note that during periods of high volatility, the mismatch in timing between ETF fund inflows and spot Bitcoin demand can cause short-term price deviations. This is one of the key reasons why recent Bitcoin ETF fund increases have not resulted in significant price movements.

As institutional funds continue to flow in, Bitcoin ETFs are still seen as a crucial channel for the long-term development of crypto assets. The interaction between ETF fund flows and the spot market will remain an important factor influencing Bitcoin’s price trends.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

Bitcoin Liquidation Levels: $16.66B Short Squeeze at $81,478, $16.04B Long Liquidation at $73,945

Gate News message, April 24 — According to Coinglass data, if Bitcoin breaks above $81,478, the cumulative short liquidation strength across major centralized exchanges would reach $1.666 billion. Conversely, if BTC drops below $73,945, the cumulative long liquidation strength across major CEXs wou

GateNews34m ago

Iran Collected Strait of Hormuz Toll in Foreign Currency, Not Bitcoin

Iran's central bank announced that the first transit fee collected from ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz was paid in "cash foreign currency," contradicting earlier reports that the toll would be collected in cryptocurrency. The payment was deposited directly into bank accounts in foreign c

CryptoFrontier55m ago

Balancer Hacker Converts 7,000 ETH to 204.7 BTC via THORChain Today

Gate News message, April 24 — The hacker who stole approximately $98 million in assets from Balancer in November 2025 has begun converting ETH to BTC through the cross-chain protocol THORChain. Today, the attacker exchanged 7,000 ETH for 204.7 BTC, valued at approximately $15.88 million, with

GateNews1h ago

Glassnode: Whales on Hyperliquid Maintain Long Positions, Expect Bitcoin Breakout

Gate News message, April 24 — According to Glassnode data, large traders on Hyperliquid have maintained sustained long positions in Bitcoin, anticipating a breakout from the current trading range. Over the past two months, these whales have steadily increased their confidence and long positions, re

GateNews2h ago

Willy Woo: Bitcoin Price Action Mirrors Nasdaq, May Need Decade to Gain Recognition as Safe Haven

Gate News message, April 24 — Crypto analyst Willy Woo stated that while most Bitcoin holders view BTC as a safe-haven asset, the reality is more nuanced. Bitcoin does possess safe-haven characteristics—for instance, it enables cross-border asset transfers via seed phrases during wartime and

GateNews2h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments