February 25 News: The Delhi High Court recently dismissed a lawsuit filed by a group of cryptocurrency investors against a certain crypto platform. Judge Prushaindra Kumar Kaurav stated that the platform is a private company and does not meet the definition of a “state” entity under Article 12 of the Constitution. Therefore, it cannot be subject to judicial intervention under Article 226, and the petition lacks a legal basis for acceptance.
The lawsuit was initiated by investors including Rana Handa and Aditya Malhotra, requesting the court to strengthen regulation of the crypto platform, and to direct the CBI or a special investigation team to investigate. They also asked for the freezing of user funds that were reportedly restricted. However, the court clearly indicated that ordering a criminal investigation is an extremely special circumstance, and some complaints have not even completed the FIR process, which is insufficient to trigger a mandatory investigation.
The core dispute in the case concerns withdrawal restrictions. Several users reported difficulty in withdrawing funds from the platform since 2025, with issues such as account valuation discrepancies and limit adjustments. Rana Handa told the court that he invested approximately 1.422 million rupees in 2021, but subsequent withdrawal obstacles led to widespread doubts about the platform’s liquidity and compliance. Affected investors had previously filed complaints through the National Cyber Crime Portal and eventually turned to legal channels to seek justice.
The court also emphasized that the regulation of cryptocurrencies falls under legislative and policy matters, which should be formulated by Parliament and regulatory agencies such as RBI and SEBI, rather than by the judiciary proactively creating rules. In the absence of clear regulations, the court prefers to guide parties to resolve disputes through traditional legal pathways such as civil lawsuits, consumer complaints, or police reports.
From an industry perspective, this ruling highlights the legal gray area caused by the still-developing crypto regulatory framework in India. For investors facing frozen funds, withdrawal difficulties, or platform disputes, obtaining quick relief through constitutional litigation becomes significantly more challenging. Legal experts generally agree that this decision follows existing constitutional principles but also amplifies concerns about the lack of crypto asset regulation, investor fund safety risks, and platform compliance reviews. It is expected that legislative discussions and regulatory policy battles will continue to intensify into 2026.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
A CEX co-founder donates $5.4 million to the UK’s Reform UK party
A CEX co-founder, Ben Delo, donated $5.4 million to the Reform UK party, and the donation took place before new UK regulations came into effect. Delo was previously fined $10 million for violating anti–money laundering compliance and received a pardon from Donald Trump. Reform UK positions itself as a pro-cryptocurrency political party and is currently facing a pause order on crypto donations. After relocating to the UK, Delo plans to be exempt from donation limits.
GateNews1h ago
Korea’s ruling party proposes the “Basic Act on Digital Assets”: stablecoins are regulated like banks, and RWA tokenization is included in the Capital Markets Act
The Democratic Party of Korea proposed a draft of the “Digital Asset Basic Act,” planning to bring stablecoins and tokenized real-world assets into existing financial regulations, making it the first economy in Asia to comprehensively regulate digital assets. The draft sets up a tough stablecoin licensing mechanism and a requirement under the Capital Markets Act for RWA tokenization, and also discusses controversies over stablecoin issuance rights, which may later advance to the end of 2026 to establish a complete regulatory framework.
ChainNewsAbmedia2h ago
SEC Crypto Safe Harbor Proposal Submitted for Review! Eligible crypto projects can begin operations without registration
U.S. SEC Chair Paul Atkins confirmed that the “safe harbor” framework for cryptocurrencies has been submitted to the White House for review. The proposal includes exemptions for new offerings and investment contracts to encourage regulation and innovation in digital assets. This has sparked enthusiastic debate in the financial industry and among cryptocurrency advocates, and going forward it will aim to strike a balance between protecting investors and promoting innovation.
CryptoCity2h ago
Multiple U.S. law enforcement agencies oppose the DeFi developer protection provisions in the Senate’s crypto bill
Multiple U.S. law enforcement groups oppose the provisions in the Senate's crypto market structure bill that protect DeFi developers, arguing that it would weaken the government's ability to combat financial crime. The bill's proposed amendments have triggered a bipartisan rift, and it remains unclear whether it can move forward in the future.
GateNews2h ago
The Dubai Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority issues token issuance guidelines, clarifying the regulatory framework for stablecoins and RWA
Dubai Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) has issued virtual asset issuance guidelines, clearly outlining the design and distribution of stablecoins and real-world asset tokens. Token issuance is divided into three categories, providing market participants with a reference by improving transparency and regulatory certainty. These guidelines are an interpretation of existing rules, not new regulations.
GateNews2h ago
New US FDIC rule! Stablecoin reserves face strict requirements and do not receive the $250k deposit insurance coverage per person
The U.S. FDIC has rolled out a regulatory framework for stablecoins, requiring 1:1 reserves, liquidity, and a redemption deadline within two days. The bill does not apply deposit insurance and is intended to ensure stability in the financial system. The FDIC clearly sets capital requirements and restrictions on returns, and clarifies the safety and compliance of stablecoins. This proposal is currently in the public comment period.
CryptoCity3h ago
