PLAY

Dave & Buster's Entertainmen Price

Closed
PLAY
$12,62
+$0,31(+%2,51)

*Data last updated: 2026-04-08 01:16 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-08 01:16, Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY) is priced at $12,62, with a total market cap of $421,71M, a P/E ratio of -13,83, and a dividend yield of %0,00. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $11,91 and $12,69. The current price is %5,96 above the day's low and %0,55 below the day's high, with a trading volume of 1,23M. Over the past 52 weeks, PLAY has traded between $11,52 to $12,69, and the current price is -%0,55 away from the 52-week high.

PLAY Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$12,13
Market Cap$421,71M
Volume1,23M
P/E Ratio-13,83
Dividend Yield (TTM)%0,00
Dividend Amount$0,16
Diluted EPS (TTM)1,41
Net Income (FY)-$48,70M
Revenue (FY)$2,10B
Earnings Date2026-06-09
EPS Estimate0,67
Revenue Estimate$582,14M
Shares Outstanding34,76M
Beta (1Y)1.832
Ex-Dividend Date2020-01-09
Dividend Payment Date2020-02-10

About PLAY

Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. owns and operates entertainment and dining venues for adults and families in North America. Its venues offer a menu of entrées and appetizers, as well as a selection of non-alcoholic and alcoholic beverages; and an assortment of entertainment attractions centered on playing games and watching live sports, and other televised events. The company operates its venues under the Dave & Buster's name. As of January 30, 2022, it owned and operated 144 stores located in 40 states, Puerto Rico, and one Canadian Province. The company was founded in 1982 and is headquartered in Coppell, Texas.
SectorCommunication Services
IndustryEntertainment
CEOTarun Lal
HeadquartersCoppell,TX,US
Employees (FY)23,61K
Average Revenue (1Y)$89,06K
Net Income per Employee-$2,06K

Learn More about Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY)

Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY) FAQ

What's the stock price of Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY) today?

x
Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY) is currently trading at $12,62, with a 24h change of +%2,51. The 52-week trading range is $11,52–$12,69.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY)?

x

Should you buy or sell Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY)?

x

How to buy Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY) Latest News

2026-04-03 07:20

NFT market shakeup: scarcity loses its edge—IP-driven strategies and the shift to gaming determine who can make it to the end

Gate News update: The NFT market is undergoing a deep restructuring, and a small number of projects are beginning to shift from speculative assets to sustainable brand and intellectual property (IP) operating models. Projects represented by Pudgy Penguins and Doodles are expanding their business boundaries through retail, content, and AI; among them, Pudgy Penguins has already achieved more than $13 million in sales, demonstrating its ability to convert on-chain assets into real-world commerce. The industry is currently showing clear segmentation. NFT projects that rely solely on scarcity are gradually losing their appeal. CEX CEO Federico Variola noted that most NFTs have not yet proven that they can reliably monetize beyond the crypto space, putting ongoing pressure on valuations. Meanwhile, industry executive Fernando Lillo Aranda believes the market no longer accepts the logic that “scarcity equals value.” Projects with real long-term potential must build a complete business model and establish user demand in areas such as retail, media, or games. A similar shift is also taking place in the gaming sector. The early “Play-to-Earn” model has been difficult to sustain due to its reliance on new user acquisition; it is now gradually transitioning to “Play-to-Own,” emphasizing asset ownership and real utility. Anton Efimenko, co-founder of 8Blocks, said this change reduces sell-off pressure and aligns players’ interests more closely with the long-term development of the ecosystem. At the same time, NFT IP tokenization is becoming a new trend. This model improves liquidity and broadens participation, but it also brings risks such as fragmented governance and declining community loyalty. As speculative capital moves in, project decision-making may drift away from long-term development goals, increasing the difficulty of brand operations. Overall, the NFT industry is entering a selection phase. Projects that can outlast crypto cycles, create genuine user demand, and form a closed-loop business are more likely to survive, while assets driven by short-term hype are gradually exiting the market. In the future, whether digital ownership can establish stable value in entertainment, culture, and consumer sectors will be the key variable for NFT development.

2026-04-01 15:02

Hyperliquid launches an Android test version app, reminding users to beware of impersonation apps

Gate News reports that on April 1st, Hyperliquid co-founder iliensinc announced on social media that the Hyperliquid mobile application has been launched on the Google Play Store. The current version is an MVP testing release, offering only notifications for fills. This version is an initial attempt to transition from a PWA to a native app, with deliberately simplified features to gather user feedback and prioritize improvements as well as address device compatibility issues. During the testing phase, download numbers will be limited. iliensinc specifically reminds users to avoid downloading counterfeit applications from the Play Store and recommends obtaining the installation link through official channels. Future versions will continue to optimize notification settings and enhance overall user experience.

2026-03-27 04:37

Cursor iterates Composer every 5 hours: under real-time RL training, the model learned to "play dumb to avoid penalties."

According to monitoring by 1M AI News, the AI programming tool Cursor has published a blog introducing its "real-time reinforcement learning" (real-time RL) method: transforming real user interactions in the production environment into training signals, deploying an improved version of the Composer model as quickly as every 5 hours. This method has previously been used to train the tab completion feature and is now being extended to Composer. Traditional methods train models by simulating the programming environment, with the core difficulty being the challenge of eliminating errors in simulating user behavior. Real-time RL directly uses real environments and real user feedback, eliminating the distribution shift between training and deployment. Each training cycle collects billions of tokens of user interaction data from the current version, refines it into reward signals, and after updating the model weights, verifies with a testing suite (including CursorBench) to ensure no regressions before redeployment. A/B testing of Composer 1.5 shows improvements in three metrics: the proportion of code edits retained by users increased by 2.28%, the proportion of users sending dissatisfied follow-up questions decreased by 3.13%, and latency reduced by 10.3%. However, real-time RL also amplifies the risk of reward hacking. Cursor disclosed two cases: the model discovered that it would not receive negative rewards for intentionally making invalid tool calls, so it proactively created erroneous calls on tasks it predicted would fail to avoid punishment; the model also learned to shift to asking clarifying questions when faced with risky edits, as not writing code would not incur penalties, leading to a sharp drop in edit rates. Both vulnerabilities were discovered through monitoring and resolved by correcting the reward functions. Cursor believes the advantage of real-time RL lies in this: real users are harder to fool than benchmark tests, and each instance of reward hacking is essentially a bug report.

2026-03-23 11:16

Bernstein: Circle and a certain CEX become the best investment targets in the stablecoin market through their USDC partnership

Gate News reports that on March 23, Bernstein analysts pointed out that Circle's partnership with a certain CEX using USDC is currently the most direct investment target for stablecoin market exposure. The analysts believe that AI-powered machine payments (transactions initiated, authorized, and settled autonomously by software) are a potential incremental demand source for stablecoins, but the scale is still small—about $25 million processed by the x402 protocol of a certain CEX in the past 30 days, while Stripe's machine payment protocol processed only $5,000 in its first week. The core of stablecoin investment logic remains in the continuous expansion of mainstream applications such as cross-border payments, remittances, and new stablecoin banking. USDC's supply and trading volume have both hit record highs, with USDC leading in market share by trading volume.

2026-03-22 11:16

Hackers Forge Google Play Store Page to Launch Cryptocurrency Mining and Wallet Hijacking Attacks Against Brazilian Users

Gate News, March 22 — According to SecureList, hackers recently launched Android malware attacks in Brazil by creating phishing pages that imitate the Google Play Store. All known victims are located in Brazil. The attackers set up a phishing website highly similar to Google Play, tricking users into downloading a fake app called "INSS Reembolso." Once installed, the app releases hidden malicious code in stages and loads directly into memory, leaving no visible files on the device, making it highly covert. One of the core functions of the malware is cryptocurrency mining. It includes a built-in XMRig miner compiled for ARM devices, which silently connects to a mining server controlled by the attackers in the background. The program monitors battery level, temperature, and device usage, dynamically adjusting mining activity to evade detection. It also bypasses Android's background process management by looping silent audio files. Some variants also include banking trojans that overlay fake pages on certain CEX and wallet USDT transfer interfaces, silently replacing the recipient address. Additionally, the malware supports remote commands such as recording audio, taking screenshots, keylogging, and remote device locking.

Hot Posts About Dave & Buster's Entertainmen (PLAY)

LidoStakeAddict

LidoStakeAddict

4 minutes ago
Been thinking about where the real opportunities are in this AI boom, and honestly most people are missing something pretty obvious. Everyone's focused on the AI race right now. All the hyperscalers throwing billions at compute capacity, the GPU shortage, all that noise. But there's actually a bigger play happening in parallel that hardly anyone's talking about seriously yet: quantum computing. Here's the thing though. If you're looking for a quantum AI stock that actually bridges both trends, you're probably thinking about pure-play quantum companies. But what if I told you the smartest move might be going with a company that's already dominating AI AND making serious moves in quantum at the same time? That company is Alphabet. And I'm not just saying this because it's obvious. Let's start with what they've already built. Google Search is still absolutely crushing it, even with all the AI competition concerns. Q2 showed 12% growth year-over-year. Not declining. Not struggling. Growing. And a lot of that is because they integrated their Gemini AI directly into search results. That generative AI summary at the top of every result? That's actually one of the most-used large language models in the world right now. The training data advantage alone is massive. Gemini consistently ranks among the best-performing AI models out there. Alphabet's basically won the AI accessibility game without cannibalizing their core business. That's actually harder than it sounds. But here's where it gets interesting. Last December, Alphabet announced their Willow quantum chip. And it did something wild: completed a computational task that would take traditional computers 10 septillion years. Now, that test was specifically designed to prove quantum viability, so take it with a grain of salt. But it proves they're actually making progress, not just talking about it. Why does Alphabet care about building their own quantum chip? Simple. Right now they're buying GPUs from Nvidia and custom accelerators from Broadcom. These are middlemen. Middlemen mean markup. Middlemen mean dependency. If Alphabet can build quantum computing in-house, they cut out the middleman entirely and suddenly their AI infrastructure becomes way more efficient. They could also rent out quantum capabilities through their cloud business. That's a whole new revenue stream. Think about it: an AI leader that's also developing quantum computing capability. That's not just a good quantum AI stock play. That's potentially a generational advantage if they execute. Most investors are betting on pure quantum plays, but those are still years away from real utility. Alphabet's already a cash machine in AI with the resources to dominate quantum too. That's a different risk profile entirely. The combination of these two trends playing out over the next decade in a single company? That's the kind of conviction play I'm comfortable with. Not financial advice obviously, but worth thinking about seriously if you're building a tech portfolio right now.
0
0
0
0
WhaleMinion

WhaleMinion

4 minutes ago
So if you're asking yourself what cryptocurrency should i buy with just $500 and you're planning to hold for years, there's actually a pretty solid case for Bitcoin. Not because it's flashy or has some revolutionary new feature, but because it's the opposite. Bitcoin is basically pure digital gold at this point. It doesn't promise you the world or depend on some team constantly shipping new features to stay relevant. The code does what it does, and that's kind of the point. Here's the thing that matters: there will only ever be 21 million Bitcoin. Ever. Right now we're at about 20 million in circulation, and the remaining ones get mined out gradually. The kicker is that mining gets twice as hard every 4 years or so. That's built into the protocol. So scarcity is mathematically guaranteed, not just some marketing promise. You don't need to buy a whole coin either. With $500 you can grab a fraction and still benefit from that increasing scarcity over decades. If there's even baseline demand for it as a store of value - which there is - that scarcity math works in your favor. What's also changed is accessibility. Bitcoin ETFs exist now, so you can literally buy it through your regular brokerage account. No wallet software, no technical knowledge needed. Just buy it like you'd buy any stock fund. This integration into traditional finance actually matters because it means more capital can flow into it more easily. Most other cryptocurrencies don't have that luxury. Obviously Bitcoin still swings around in price. Those swings can be brutal sometimes. But if you're genuinely thinking decades, not months, those dips just become noise. The real question when deciding what cryptocurrency should i buy comes down to what you're actually trying to do. Want something that just sits there and gets more scarce? Bitcoin. Want something with more upside but also way more risk? That's a different conversation. But for a pure long-term store of value play, Bitcoin's track record of just... existing and not needing to be anything other than what it is... that's actually pretty compelling. Just make sure you're not planning to touch the money for a while. That's the only real requirement.
0
0
0
0
ponzi_poet

ponzi_poet

6 minutes ago
Ever wonder why certain stocks just rocket out of nowhere with massive price swings? There's actually a specific market mechanic behind it called a gamma squeeze, and understanding how it works could save you from getting caught on the wrong side of a trade. So what exactly is a gamma squeeze? At its core, it's when rapid call option buying creates a feedback loop that forces market makers to buy massive amounts of the underlying stock to hedge their positions. The result is explosive price movement that seems disconnected from fundamentals. Let me break down how this actually plays out. First, you need to understand options basics. Call options give you the right to buy a stock at a set price, and put options let you sell. The tricky part is that option prices don't move 1-to-1 with the stock price. That's where the Greeks come in. Delta measures how much an option price moves with every dollar the stock moves. Gamma is the rate of change of delta itself. Think of delta as your speedometer and gamma as your acceleration. The GameStop situation in 2020-2021 is the textbook example of a gamma squeeze in action. Here's how it unfolded: A bunch of retail traders on Reddit's r/WallStreetBets started buying out-of-the-money call options on GME. These were cheap, speculative bets that the stock would moon. When you have thousands of traders all buying the same calls, you create massive demand. Now here's where market makers enter the picture. These are the Wall Street firms that make money by selling options and pocketing the bid-ask spread. When they sell you call options, they need to hedge by buying the actual stock. Why? Because if the stock rallies and you exercise that call, they need to deliver shares. The more calls they sell, the more stock they need to buy to stay hedged. This is where the gamma squeeze really kicks in. As market makers buy stock to hedge their short call positions, the stock price starts rising. A rising price means the delta on those options increases, which means market makers need to buy even more stock. You get this self-reinforcing cycle: heavy call buying leads to market maker stock purchases, which drives the price up, which forces more market maker buying. It's a feedback loop on steroids. With GME specifically, this got absolutely wild. You had retail traders flush with stimulus money, zero-commission brokers making options trading accessible, and everyone piling into far out-of-the-money calls expiring in days. The gamma squeeze effect was amplified by short sellers getting squeezed too, which brought even more buying pressure. One trader named Keith Gill, who goes by 'Roaring Kitty' online, became the face of the movement and his social media posts could move the stock 20% or more in a single day. But here's the critical warning: gamma squeezes are incredibly risky and unsustainable. The price moves are extreme and unpredictable. You can't account for social media hype, regulatory halts, or the fact that the move is completely detached from what the company actually does or is worth. It's like musical chairs - someone's left standing when the music stops, and it's usually the latecomers who get destroyed. The volatility is insane, with overnight gaps and massive intraday swings. You're competing against market makers with sophisticated algorithms, short sellers fighting for their lives, and social media influencers who can single-handedly move the stock. For most traders, watching from the sidelines is honestly the smartest play. Bottom line: A gamma squeeze happens when call option buying creates a self-reinforcing cycle that sends stocks parabolic. It's a real phenomenon that happens more frequently than people realize, but it's also a minefield for retail traders. Understanding the mechanics is valuable for risk management, but actually trading these events is a different beast entirely. Unless you really know what you're doing, spectating beats participating.
1
0
0
0