The recent hundreds-of-times surge of a certain privacy project is not unfounded. Delving into its underlying logic reveals that it cleverly addresses the two core contradictions in the current crypto market: users' desire for strong privacy and regulatory authorities' demand for on-chain traceability. The collision of these two forces has been transformed by it into a new paradigm of "compliant privacy"—which is precisely why it has attracted significant institutional attention.
Compared to established privacy coins like Monero that pursue complete anonymity, this project has chosen a more pragmatic approach. It leverages cutting-edge cryptographic technologies such as zero-knowledge proofs (zk-SNARKs) to keep transactions private by default, while also reserving a channel for selective disclosure to meet legal compliance—proof can be provided when needed, and user privacy remains fully protected when not. This design philosophy significantly reduces the adoption barriers and policy concerns for traditional financial institutions amid the gradual implementation of regulatory frameworks like MiCA in Europe and the US.
More interestingly, its ambitions go far beyond ordinary transfers. Its technical architecture targets the untapped blue ocean of real-world asset (RWA) tokenization. For example, its collaboration with the Dutch licensed exchange NPEX illustrates this well—through its infrastructure, traditional securities and assets can be traded on-chain while maintaining privacy. Once such application scenarios are widely adopted, it will greatly increase the ceiling for institutional capital inflows.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CommunityJanitor
· 14h ago
Wow, zk privacy + compliance channels are really a brilliant combo. The philosophy of Monero's complete resistance has long been outdated.
RWA really hasn't been deeply explored yet. If privacy and on-chain assets could be combined... institutions have been waiting for this.
But honestly, will regulators really let it operate safely with selective disclosure? Or will it just be all talk and no action in the end?
Hundreds of times return is indeed crazy, but is it a bit late to enter now? The institutional funding rounds of this scale probably ended long ago.
Are there any details about the NPEX partnership? Feels like this part is a bit vague.
View OriginalReply0
RugResistant
· 14h ago
Damn, the compliance and privacy approach is truly brilliant. You want privacy but also need to pass regulatory scrutiny—that's real genius design.
By the way, why didn't Monero think of this approach? It's too rigid.
Institutional entry is inevitable; everyone wants a piece of the RWA cake.
But still, be cautious—history tends to repeat itself.
Wait, is this guy serious about the NPEX partnership? Is it real or just talk?
The zk technology has indeed been hyped up in the past two years, but this time it seems a bit different.
That's why I've always been optimistic about this track; someone should have done this a long time ago.
Speaking of which, projects that truly balance both sides are few and far between.
A compliant privacy coin? I never even thought of such a thing before.
Once institutional funds come in, it's a whole different game. Retail investors' efforts won't be enough to keep up.
But how long this rally can last depends on the execution moving forward.
This project's product strength is real; it's not just hype.
View OriginalReply0
FarmToRiches
· 14h ago
Wow, can compliance and privacy really hold up? It feels like Monero is about to be ground into the dirt.
View OriginalReply0
ForkTongue
· 14h ago
Compliance and privacy, this set of things sounds good, but how many projects can truly reconcile these two contradictions?
This wave indeed hits the pain points of traditional finance, but I still have some doubts about how far RWA can be expanded.
Zero knowledge technology has been hyped for so many years, finally some projects are using it in the right way?
Honestly, the influx of institutional funds isn't necessarily a good thing; I'm worried it will lead to over-regulation.
With the implementation of MiCA, privacy coins have completely changed, and now that has become a selling point? I'm stunned.
It seems that Monero's approach has been proven to be a dead end, but how far this compromise solution can go is really uncertain.
View OriginalReply0
GmGmNoGn
· 14h ago
The compliance and privacy stuff, honestly, is just about wanting to have both fish and bear paws. But this time, the direction is indeed right... Institutional funds are attracted by the smell of profit, understandable.
---
If zk proofs can truly solve the deadlock between privacy and regulation, then the imagination space on the RWA side is indeed terrifyingly large.
---
Smarter than Monero, they say, "I have channels but don't necessarily use them." This psychological play is quite clever.
---
Wait, is the NPEX partnership real? If it really materializes, the story of bringing traditional assets on-chain will no longer be just talk.
---
If the logic behind hundreds of times growth is true, then is now the time to enter, chasing the high or stepping into a new phase... I'm a bit unsure.
---
Honestly, the biggest gamble for projects like this is whether regulation will truly accept this "selective disclosure." It's still too early to talk about implementation.
---
What does institutional capital influx mean? It means they won't be arbitrarily delisted anymore, and that's the most valuable thing.
---
The story of privacy coins is told again and again. Now, with a different shell, the ceiling suddenly opens? I find that hard to believe.
View OriginalReply0
GasGoblin
· 14h ago
Haha, okay, finally someone understands how to balance this.
The Monero approach of a one-size-fits-all method is indeed satisfying, but it's a dead end; institutions simply don't touch it.
I agree with the idea of selective disclosure; it's really about finding that right point.
I'm optimistic about RWA; traditional finance is just missing an entry point for "compliant privacy."
But on the other hand, could selective disclosure become a new gray market tool?
zk proofs sound impressive, but how far are we from practical implementation?
Wait, does the collaboration with institutions like NPEX mean there's big capital behind the scenes pushing the wave?
Hundreds of times increase... early adopters must be making a fortune. I was late to the game and missed out again.
The recent hundreds-of-times surge of a certain privacy project is not unfounded. Delving into its underlying logic reveals that it cleverly addresses the two core contradictions in the current crypto market: users' desire for strong privacy and regulatory authorities' demand for on-chain traceability. The collision of these two forces has been transformed by it into a new paradigm of "compliant privacy"—which is precisely why it has attracted significant institutional attention.
Compared to established privacy coins like Monero that pursue complete anonymity, this project has chosen a more pragmatic approach. It leverages cutting-edge cryptographic technologies such as zero-knowledge proofs (zk-SNARKs) to keep transactions private by default, while also reserving a channel for selective disclosure to meet legal compliance—proof can be provided when needed, and user privacy remains fully protected when not. This design philosophy significantly reduces the adoption barriers and policy concerns for traditional financial institutions amid the gradual implementation of regulatory frameworks like MiCA in Europe and the US.
More interestingly, its ambitions go far beyond ordinary transfers. Its technical architecture targets the untapped blue ocean of real-world asset (RWA) tokenization. For example, its collaboration with the Dutch licensed exchange NPEX illustrates this well—through its infrastructure, traditional securities and assets can be traded on-chain while maintaining privacy. Once such application scenarios are widely adopted, it will greatly increase the ceiling for institutional capital inflows.