2026-01-12 08:31:03

Getting market information is just the beginning; true efficiency comes from having AI help you organize. For example, using AI to summarize group chat updates and quickly understand what everyone discussed yesterday is like having your first intelligent assistant.

Furthermore, a second AI assistant can analyze popular cryptocurrencies daily, helping you catch key events happening today—so you don't have to manually sift through all information sources.

These applications are only the early stages of human-AI symbiosis, currently less than 10% of the entire workflow optimization. Imagine when this system is fully established, with AI assisting in every link from information collection, analysis, decision-making, to execution—that's true efficiency elevation.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasBankrupter

· 01-14 16:46

I love this idea, but to be honest, using AI to organize group chats still easily drops the ball. Wait, is the second AI you mentioned really reliable? It still feels like you need to keep an eye on it yourself. This is the future, but someone has to be willing to pay for it. NGL, the entire automation process still feels like it will take a few more years.

View OriginalReply0

PebbleHander

· 01-14 13:10

Sounds good, but it still seems like it will be a long time before this system is truly implemented. --- AI organizes information? I can already manually scroll through screens pretty quickly, haha. --- That's a bit exaggerated; you still have to rely on your own judgment. --- This idea is good, provided that AI can really help you capture the core information. --- Sounds nice, but the key question is which AI is this reliable. --- It should have been like this a long time ago, but I still feel the need to verify the data myself. --- Only 10% optimization of the entire workflow? How much longer do we have to wait? --- It feels like it’s tailor-made for lazy people; I still prefer to analyze myself.

View OriginalReply0

ForkMonger

· 01-13 10:33

nah this is just cope for people who can't read chart patterns themselves. you're basically outsourcing your decision-making to a black box, which sounds like a governance attack waiting to happen. centralized information flows into decentralized systems? that's where protocol darwinism bites back.

Reply0

GateUser-75ee51e7

· 01-12 09:01

Damn, now I understand why some people make money so quickly --- Running two AI assistants is indeed comfortable, but I'm worried about the accuracy of the information sources --- Not even 10%? Then what's the point of room for growth --- To put it nicely, the real key is whether AI's judgment is reliable or not --- Once this system is built, anyone can sit back and win, just thinking about it is exciting --- I've already been using the summary group chat, it really saves trouble --- The idea of efficiency upgrade sounds good, but what about the costs? Is no one discussing this --- Fully automated execution? Still feels a bit timid

View OriginalReply0

CryptoTarotReader

· 01-12 09:01

Really, AI organizing group chat information is indeed lightning-fast. There's a bunch of nonsense in the group, now just give me the highlights. I'm a bit overwhelmed, this is totally cheating. Wait, this has to be a reliable AI, otherwise it would just produce all incorrect information. Boosting efficiency sounds great, but I'm just worried that in the end I still have to go over everything myself.

View OriginalReply0

RugpullSurvivor

· 01-12 09:00

Uh, that's not right. If I keep going like this, I'll have to support ten AI assistants.

View OriginalReply0

PumpingCroissant

· 01-12 08:53

Really, not using AI to organize group chat updates now means you're falling behind --- Less than 10%, think about the potential ahead, this is the real upside --- Come on, fully automated decision execution? Then what do we still need to do --- The group chat summary feature is indeed very useful, saving a lot of time checking messages --- Wait, if this system is really built, do retail investors still have a chance --- AI assistants stacking up ≠ making money, the key is still the information edge --- Both AIs are set up, but I still trust my intuition more when it comes to choosing coins

View OriginalReply0

GmGmNoGn

· 01-12 08:49

This time AI is going to take my job again. Honestly, it's still the information gap causing the trouble.

View OriginalReply0

MemecoinTrader

· 01-12 08:48

ngl the real alpha is orchestrating which ai reads which chat first. sentiment cascade architecture hits different when you own the information hierarchy

Reply0

MeaninglessApe

· 01-12 08:32

Sounds good, but the real implementation still depends. Everyone is talking about AI everywhere now, but how many are actually using it? I've tried AI organizing group chats, but it often misses key information, so I have to check again myself. 10% optimization is easy to say, but the remaining 90% is hell. Crypto information sources are so chaotic, can AI really filter out useful info for me? I think it's difficult. Fully automated workflows? Wake up, it still relies on human judgment.

View OriginalReply0