Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Perp DEX trading landscape changes: Lighter leads with $4.7 billion, EdgeX surpasses Hyperliquid to rank second
【CoinPush】These past two days, the Perp DEX market has been quite interesting. According to the latest on-chain data, the trading activity of mainstream perpetual exchanges over the past 24 hours has shown a clear divergence—some are booming, while others appear quite subdued.
Let’s first look at the deployment of trading volume. Lighter is leading by a mile, with a 24-hour trading volume reaching $4.75 billion, firmly holding the top spot; its TVL reserves are $1.39 billion, and open interest is $1.51 billion. Following closely is EdgeX, with a trading volume of $2.77 billion, slightly behind Lighter, but this time surpassing Hyperliquid to take second place, with a TVL of $365 million and open interest of $742 million.
Hyperliquid’s performance is somewhat intriguing—its trading volume is $2.45 billion, ranking third, but it has the deepest TVL reserves at $4.13 billion and the largest open interest at $7.09 billion, indicating that its user base and position depth are still solid.
Further down the list, Aster contributes an average daily trading volume of $2.06 billion, with TVL and open interest at $1.27 billion and $2.42 billion respectively; platforms like ApeX, Variational, Backpack, and Pacifica, though relatively smaller in size, have trading volumes of $1.59 billion, $1.09 billion, $813 million, and $650 million, each holding their own position.
Overall, on-chain liquidity is still in a period of adjustment, but the competitive landscape among leading platforms is changing rapidly.