Here’s a sharp critique of the current three major mainstream AIs:


1⃣ Google is like a product manager battle simulator; their launch events are always the biggest in the world. But once it’s time to implement, they start to water down the progress. Their entire ecosystem has been calling for two years, yet everyone is still doing their own thing. It feels like the team’s daily focus is on writing reports to keep their jobs, rather than actually coding.
2⃣ Anthropic is like a cyber Puritan; their coding skills are indeed top-notch, but their moral squeamishness is also truly outrageous. Their risk control is extremely esoteric—pay for a membership and you can still be banned without warning. They adopt a noble stance of “use it if you like, if not, get out, don’t dirty my servers.”
3⃣ OpenAI is a big talker and a professional palace intriguer; their demo videos always blow the entire universe away. When asked about release dates, they always reply “in the coming weeks.” They’ve completely lost their own rhythm, relying entirely on watching competitors’ moves. As soon as a rival makes a move, they quickly release a semi-finished product to grab headlines. They talk about open source and AGI saving humanity, but in reality, they are honestly just working for Wall Street.
Where are these sharp critiques right or wrong?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin