2025-12-28 04:23:23

Mira Network currently presents itself less as a carefully crafted price growth mechanism and more as a pre-built settlement and clearing system that can operate sustainably for the emerging trusted AI sector, which currently has insufficient market pricing. This approach is quite interesting—rather than rushing to hype up the token price, it first uses system infrastructure to support the early-stage AI demand. Once the market truly recognizes and understands the value of such demand, the entire mechanism can naturally get up and running. This forward-looking design, to some extent, reflects the project's consideration of how to lay the groundwork for the long-term development of emerging sectors.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ProveMyZK

· 5h ago

The infrastructure theory is back again. This logic sounds comfortable, but can it really be implemented?

View OriginalReply0

FOMOmonster

· 5h ago

This approach is indeed different; building infrastructure is much more honest than just speculating on coin prices.

View OriginalReply0

HackerWhoCares

· 5h ago

Hmm... build the infrastructure first and then wait for the explosion. I like this approach much better than those that start with crazy pumping right away.

View OriginalReply0

StakeOrRegret

· 5h ago

Bro, your thinking is indeed different. Build the infrastructure first and wait for the opportunity. This wave is a bit steady. --- The valuation of trusted AI is now a fog. Mira's approach is interesting. --- Not just hype the coin price and lay out the track? If we can survive until that day, it would be worth it. --- Build the infrastructure first, and the coin price will naturally rise. The key is whether you can endure or not. --- Wait, are we betting that the future market will really recognize trusted AI? --- This set of logic sounds good, but I'm afraid not many projects will stick to it until the end. --- Forward-looking design sounds fancy, but it still depends on how the follow-up execution goes. --- Settlement systems may sound boring, but if laid out correctly, they can make big money.

View OriginalReply0

DataPickledFish

· 5h ago

This approach is indeed clear-headed. It's not about rushing into the price of the coin at the start, but about building the underlying infrastructure first. There are really teams willing to do this kind of long-term work. The market will only explode when the understanding reaches a certain level. If the infrastructure is well built, there's no need to rush later... this is the real gameplay. The trustworthy AI sector has indeed been underestimated. When the opportunity arrives, it will be great. But to be honest, how many of the current investors truly understand this logic? I am optimistic about project teams that don't hype and focus on laying the groundwork first.

View OriginalReply0

consensus_failure

· 5h ago

Wow, now that's what I call true vision. Instead of rushing to be the market maker, focusing on building infrastructure is indeed a brilliant approach. To be honest, most projects are still thinking about how to manipulate the market; they are trying to lay the groundwork, which is a huge difference. But the question is, when will the market truly understand this value? How long do we have to wait? I feel this approach is correct, but I'm worried that during execution, it might turn into another set of excuses.

View OriginalReply0