✍️ Gate 廣場「創作者認證激勵計劃」進行中!
我們歡迎優質創作者積極創作,申請認證
贏取豪華代幣獎池、Gate 精美周邊、流量曝光等超過 $10,000+ 豐厚獎勵!
立即報名 👉 https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
📕 認證申請步驟:
1️⃣ App 首頁底部進入【廣場】 → 點擊右上角頭像進入個人主頁
2️⃣ 點擊頭像右下角【申請認證】進入認證頁面,等待審核
讓優質內容被更多人看到,一起共建創作者社區!
活動詳情:https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
This morning's @RialoHQ Shark Tank was honestly nothing like what I expected from a pitch event. It felt more like several project teams getting together to sync on progress and checkpoints.
The overall vibe was pretty relaxed. The host even chatted about food during the opening, the pace was slow and easy, no signs of overly rehearsed performances, and nobody came out with grand narratives. Everyone was pretty straightforward—talking about what's done, what's stuck, laying it all out openly. That's what made it feel genuinely authentic.
There were just three projects total, which was just right—you could actually absorb it all. Let me share my quick thoughts:
**First project: automated trading.** The logic is actually quite clear—taking traditional off-chain trading bot mechanics and executing them directly on-chain. No need for third parties watching the charts; rules are hardcoded on-chain, removing middlemen. The structure is clean. But it's never run with real money yet, still just at the "logic is viable" stage. There's still distance to go before handling real market volatility.
**Second: real estate RWA.** This feels more like testing reality's boundaries. On-chain is just a small part; the real headaches are all off-chain. They chose Nigeria to start, even set up an offline property inspection team. That shows they're not just playing NFT gimmicks—they understand the need for real-world compliance and execution. But this kind of project is destined to be slow. Every new market means rerunning through regulations. Fast scaling isn't realistic.
**Third: AI agent.** This looks more like an experimental ground to me. Not treating AI as a tool, but letting it become an independent agent that can take tasks, earn bounties, and participate in markets. Using cost mechanisms instead of human review—the logic flows on-chain, but the core question remains the same: is there real demand and real users? No tasks, no users, and even a perfect mechanism just spins empty.
Looking at all three together, the direction is actually consistent: they're all shifting execution rights away from people and centralized platforms, moving them onto the chain.
The direction is sound, but reality is this kind of migration can't happen all at once, especially when dealing with real assets and complex AI behaviors. Whether on-chain rules can actually handle it still needs genuine validation.
People at the event asked about security, compliance, and profit models. Honestly, I don't think that matters much at this stage. Whether there are bugs gets found through running it. Whether it's compliant becomes clear after launch. Whether it can make money only matters if people actually use it.
My expectations for Rialo Shark Tank are simple: no performance-style pitching. Keep it real, talk substance. Less grand narrative, more progress updates, sticking points, and actual test results. Getting projects to actually ship beats everything else. If there are questions, don't hold back—go straight for the core issues.