These days, it seems that the more money you invest, the more serious the anti-reinvestment becomes.

It was previously said that zero-reinvestment is risk-free; doing testnets is just a waste of time and effort, like Monad.
Then it was said that investing funds is necessary so that the airdrop weight is higher, and the project team sees it as a high-quality community user.
The Perps track is even more popular, with a funding model where "higher transaction fee loss = more airdrops," almost all of which are being manipulated.
But still underestimated the project teams' true intentions—VOOI, BackPack, Paradex, EdgeX...
You’re after the project team’s airdrops, but what they’re after is your principal.
Not only is it a waste of time and effort, but your principal is also being harvested.
Now in the profit-taking circle, the harder you try, the more you lose.
Some project teams have no bottom line for profit, with sickles that are big and fast.
The market is bearish, there’s no liquidity in the crypto space, and no fresh blood coming in. More and more project teams are choosing to cut openly.
So, let’s dispel the illusions about all project teams, no matter how tempting their backgrounds seem.
In a bear market, it’s better to do less and watch more. Often, doing nothing already puts you ahead of most people.
Is the airdrop track completely cooled down? I don’t think so; new models should emerge. Before opportunities appear, lying flat for a while is also pretty good.