Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Visa Quietly Takes Control of On-Chain Crypto Card Payments
Visa has emerged as the clear dominant force in on-chain crypto card transactions, capturing over 90% of total on-chain card volume by early 2026.
This lead stands out even more given that both Visa and Mastercard support 130+ crypto-linked card programs globally, yet actual on-chain usage has consolidated overwhelmingly onto Visa’s rails.
The gap is not a matter of branding, it is structural.
How Visa Built a Structural Advantage
Visa’s dominance traces back to decisions made well before crypto cards became a serious volume driver.
Early infrastructure alignment proved decisive. Visa moved quickly to integrate with crypto-native program managers, issuing platforms, and settlement providers—the “plumbing” layer that sits beneath consumer-facing cards. Once these integrations were in place, scaling new products became frictionless.
More importantly, Visa leaned into full-stack issuance models. Through Principal Member relationships, crypto firms can issue cards and settle transactions directly on Visa’s network, without relying on legacy sponsor banks.
Two of the most important examples are Rain and Reap, both of which issue and settle directly on Visa rails, often using stablecoins. This structure lowers costs, reduces compliance bottlenecks, and accelerates time to market.
Stablecoins Changed the Economics
Visa’s early adoption of native stablecoin settlement turned out to be a major inflection point.
This allowed issuers to settle card balances directly on-chain, rather than routing through fiat intermediaries. The result was faster settlement, lower treasury overhead, and better alignment with crypto-native business models.
Mastercard, by contrast, maintained more traditional settlement structures for longer—slowing adoption among crypto-first platforms.
Project Concentration Tells the Story
A review of representative on-chain crypto card projects highlights how skewed the ecosystem has become:
This concentration compounds over time. Liquidity, compliance tooling, and issuer experience all improve faster on the dominant network, making Visa even harder to displace.
Market Size Is Now Too Big to Ignore
By early 2026, the crypto card market reached meaningful scale:
At this scale, network effects matter more than experimental features—and Visa is already where most activity lives.
Why Mastercard Fell Behind
Mastercard has not been absent. Its initiatives, including Crypto Credential standards, focus heavily on identity, compliance, and consumer protections. However, stricter onboarding requirements, longer review cycles, and higher effective costs have pushed many crypto-native issuers toward Visa instead.
For startups operating in fast-moving, margin-sensitive environments, Visa’s flexibility has simply been a better fit.