Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
The White House strengthens its position in negotiations on the Digital Assets Act: policy should not serve political goals
The Trump administration clearly outlined its position during intense negotiations on comprehensive legislation that will serve as the foundation for regulating the cryptocurrency market. According to high-ranking White House sources, current debates go far beyond technical details—they revolve around how the U.S. government plans to position itself in the global digital economy.
Main Principle: Policy Without Persecution
Patrick Witte, who coordinates the work of the Presidential Advisory Council on Digital Assets, made a strong declaration of the administration’s stance to media outlet CoinDesk. “We have set firm boundaries for all negotiators. It’s unacceptable for proposed regulations to be used as tools against the head of state or their close associates,” Witte explained. This firm position reflects a core principle: quality legislation should be based on systemic logic, not personal grievances or political calculations.
The administration rejects a narrow interpretation of its stance as simply a “pro-crypto lobby.” Witte emphasized that the White House adheres to a broader vision—supporting innovation across all sectors, including artificial intelligence, blockchain infrastructure, financial technologies, and alternative trading channels, including OTC (over-the-counter) markets, which play a key role in digital asset distribution. “This government is focused on technological progress,” he noted. “We need clear rules of the game that allow these industries to develop without excessive bureaucracy.”
Critical Point: Ethics or Censorship?
One of the main sticking points in negotiations centers around ethical standards concerning the participation of government officials and their family members in the crypto industry. Early discussions proposed extremely strict restrictions, effectively banning spouses and relatives of officials from any involvement in the sector.
“The initial proposals demonstrated an absurd approach,” Witte critically assessed. “You don’t solve ethical issues by banning entire families from the industry.” According to him, the administration is willing to accept reasonable conflict-of-interest restrictions but will not agree to provisions that turn family members of officials into informants within their own countries. The true goal of policy is to strike a balance between transparency and fairness.
Geopolitical Necessity: The Race for Leadership
Witte emphasized the critical importance of this moment in the context of global competition. “If we miss this opportunity,” he warned, “the innovative development of the crypto sector and digital technologies will continue—but not on American soil.” His words reflect a growing understanding within the administration that advanced financial technologies and blockchain solutions are becoming essential elements of national competitive advantage.
A new global financial architecture is being formed right now. The U.S. can either actively influence this process through smart legislation or remain on the sidelines, watching leadership shift to other countries. This is not an ideological issue—it’s a matter of strategic survival.
Signs of Compromise: Pragmatism Prevails
Despite current disagreements, Witte expressed cautious optimism. He noted that some Democrats are shifting toward more pragmatic positions, recognizing that a constructive regulatory system offers more benefits than punitive measures. The goal is straightforward: to turn digital assets into a fully recognized, regulated part of the financial system, rather than imposing targeted bans that fail to address real market issues.
The ongoing negotiations demonstrate that both political parties are gradually realizing that quality cryptocurrency legislation is not a threat but an opportunity—an opportunity to strengthen the U.S. in the digital economy, protect investors, and create a favorable environment for innovation.
Note: Amid these political developments, the Trump team has mobilized significant financial resources ahead of the upcoming elections.