Bessent says tariff refund would be ‘ultimate corporate welfare’
Daniel Flatley
Updated Sat, February 21, 2026 at 8:25 AM GMT+9 2 min read
(Bloomberg) — Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said any refunds from tariffs struck down by the Supreme Court would amount to “ultimate corporate welfare,” suggesting he sees no benefit flowing to American consumers.
“If there is a payout, it’s just going to be the ultimate corporate welfare,” Bessent said on Fox News Friday hours after the high court’s ruling — which left unanswered the question of what happens with money already collected.
Most Read from Bloomberg:
Private Prisons Face an Existential Threat Under Trump's New Detention Plan
How Zoning Won
A Shaker Revival Points to Something Deeper Than a Trad Obsession
White House Ballroom Design Approved by Trump Commission After One Hearing
Bessent said litigation over refunds could turn into a months- or years-long process, and “could be a mess.” Earlier Friday, when asked about potential refunds at an Economic Club of Dallas event, the Treasury chief said he had “a feeling the American people won’t see it.”
Companies could be the ones to benefit, he indicated on Fox News. Bessent cited a scenario where a Chinese supplier cut its price for an American importer, with the importer then paying the tariff but keeping the product’s final price tag unchanged. Giving the importer a refund would then be a net new benefit for that firm.
Bessent said the amount of revenue affected by the Supreme Court’s decision would be closer to $130 billion than estimates of up to $175 billion. The court ruled Friday that President Donald Trump could not impose tariffs using a law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
Trump said he would re-impose most of the tariffs using other authorities. Bessent in a speech earlier Friday said that revenue collected from tariffs will be “virtually unchanged” in 2026 despite the ruling, thanks to the administration’s backup plan.
The other mechanisms include authorities granted by Congress known as Section 122, 232 and 301 authorities. Bessent said on Fox News that those methods are “less direct and slightly more convoluted.”
“Treasury’s estimates show that the use of Section 122 authority, combined with potentially enhanced Section 232 and Section 301 tariffs will result in virtually unchanged tariff revenue in 2026,” he said in prepared remarks to the Economic Club of Dallas.
The Treasury chief also called on US trading partners that have already reached agreements with the Trump administration based on the IEEPA tariffs to abide by them.
“I think that everyone is going to honor their deal,” he said on Fox News. He also said the Supreme Court had reaffirmed that the president has the right to “a complete embargo,” so that poses a “draconian alternative” for other nations.
Story Continues
Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek
Supreme Court’s Tariff Ruling Is Secretly a Gift to Trump
How Jerome Powell Is Trump-Proofing the Fed
Millennials Melted Their Brains With Screens. Their Kids Want None of It
The Georgia Pastor Accused of Defrauding the VA of Nearly $24 Million
Kids Want Cheap Stuff, and Lots of It. Five Below Delivers
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Bessent says tariff refund would be ‘ultimate corporate welfare’
Bessent says tariff refund would be ‘ultimate corporate welfare’
Daniel Flatley
Updated Sat, February 21, 2026 at 8:25 AM GMT+9 2 min read
(Bloomberg) — Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said any refunds from tariffs struck down by the Supreme Court would amount to “ultimate corporate welfare,” suggesting he sees no benefit flowing to American consumers.
“If there is a payout, it’s just going to be the ultimate corporate welfare,” Bessent said on Fox News Friday hours after the high court’s ruling — which left unanswered the question of what happens with money already collected.
Most Read from Bloomberg:
Bessent said litigation over refunds could turn into a months- or years-long process, and “could be a mess.” Earlier Friday, when asked about potential refunds at an Economic Club of Dallas event, the Treasury chief said he had “a feeling the American people won’t see it.”
Companies could be the ones to benefit, he indicated on Fox News. Bessent cited a scenario where a Chinese supplier cut its price for an American importer, with the importer then paying the tariff but keeping the product’s final price tag unchanged. Giving the importer a refund would then be a net new benefit for that firm.
Bessent said the amount of revenue affected by the Supreme Court’s decision would be closer to $130 billion than estimates of up to $175 billion. The court ruled Friday that President Donald Trump could not impose tariffs using a law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
Trump said he would re-impose most of the tariffs using other authorities. Bessent in a speech earlier Friday said that revenue collected from tariffs will be “virtually unchanged” in 2026 despite the ruling, thanks to the administration’s backup plan.
The other mechanisms include authorities granted by Congress known as Section 122, 232 and 301 authorities. Bessent said on Fox News that those methods are “less direct and slightly more convoluted.”
“Treasury’s estimates show that the use of Section 122 authority, combined with potentially enhanced Section 232 and Section 301 tariffs will result in virtually unchanged tariff revenue in 2026,” he said in prepared remarks to the Economic Club of Dallas.
The Treasury chief also called on US trading partners that have already reached agreements with the Trump administration based on the IEEPA tariffs to abide by them.
“I think that everyone is going to honor their deal,” he said on Fox News. He also said the Supreme Court had reaffirmed that the president has the right to “a complete embargo,” so that poses a “draconian alternative” for other nations.
Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek
©2026 Bloomberg L.P.
Terms and Privacy Policy
Privacy Dashboard
More Info