The latest Federal Reserve January monetary policy meeting minutes show that officials expressed clear disagreements over the outlook for interest rates, wavering between curbing inflation and supporting the labor market.
After the monetary policy meeting concluded on January 28, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) announced that the target range for the federal funds rate would remain unchanged at 3.50% to 3.75%, ending a three-rate cut streak.
In the decision, two Fed officials, Stephen Miran and Christopher Waller, voted against the measure, favoring a 25 basis point rate cut.
The newly released minutes state, “In assessing the outlook for monetary policy, some participants indicated that it might be appropriate to further lower the federal funds rate target range if inflation declines as expected.”
However, there was no consensus among policymakers on the next steps, with some emphasizing inflation suppression and others prioritizing employment support.
The minutes note, “Some participants believe that during the committee’s cautious assessment of upcoming data, policy rates may need to remain unchanged for a period. Some judge that further easing is not appropriate until a clear downward trend in inflation is established.”
Additionally, a few officials suggested that the possibility of rate hikes should not be ruled out and hoped that the post-meeting statement would more clearly reflect that “rate decisions are two-sided.”
The minutes did not specify individual speakers but used vague terms like “some,” “a few,” “many,” and “most” to describe positions.
Most participants expect U.S. inflation to gradually decline this year, but the pace and timing remain uncertain. They mentioned tariffs’ upward pressure on prices and expect their impact to diminish over time.
The document states, “Most participants warned that progress toward the 2% inflation target could be slower and more uneven than expected, and the risk of inflation remaining above target remains significant.”
Nick Timiraos, a Fed spokesperson, commented that officials’ concerns about the labor market have eased, while worries about inflation have increased, with central bank officials describing inflation above the target as “a significant risk.”
Another analysis suggests that if Kevin Woorh is approved as the next Fed chair, internal divisions could further widen.
(Article source: Caixin)
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Federal Reserve Minutes Reveal Split on Interest Rate Path: A Battle Among Doves, Holders, and Hawks
The latest Federal Reserve January monetary policy meeting minutes show that officials expressed clear disagreements over the outlook for interest rates, wavering between curbing inflation and supporting the labor market.
After the monetary policy meeting concluded on January 28, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) announced that the target range for the federal funds rate would remain unchanged at 3.50% to 3.75%, ending a three-rate cut streak.
In the decision, two Fed officials, Stephen Miran and Christopher Waller, voted against the measure, favoring a 25 basis point rate cut.
The newly released minutes state, “In assessing the outlook for monetary policy, some participants indicated that it might be appropriate to further lower the federal funds rate target range if inflation declines as expected.”
However, there was no consensus among policymakers on the next steps, with some emphasizing inflation suppression and others prioritizing employment support.
The minutes note, “Some participants believe that during the committee’s cautious assessment of upcoming data, policy rates may need to remain unchanged for a period. Some judge that further easing is not appropriate until a clear downward trend in inflation is established.”
Additionally, a few officials suggested that the possibility of rate hikes should not be ruled out and hoped that the post-meeting statement would more clearly reflect that “rate decisions are two-sided.”
The minutes did not specify individual speakers but used vague terms like “some,” “a few,” “many,” and “most” to describe positions.
Most participants expect U.S. inflation to gradually decline this year, but the pace and timing remain uncertain. They mentioned tariffs’ upward pressure on prices and expect their impact to diminish over time.
The document states, “Most participants warned that progress toward the 2% inflation target could be slower and more uneven than expected, and the risk of inflation remaining above target remains significant.”
Nick Timiraos, a Fed spokesperson, commented that officials’ concerns about the labor market have eased, while worries about inflation have increased, with central bank officials describing inflation above the target as “a significant risk.”
Another analysis suggests that if Kevin Woorh is approved as the next Fed chair, internal divisions could further widen.
(Article source: Caixin)