Source: Cryptonews
Original Title: Vitalik Buterin: Institutions will push Ethereum toward more decentralization, not less
Original Link:
Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin said institutions seeking control over their own operations will drive decentralization rather than undermine it.
Summary
Vitalik Buterin says institutions prefer self-custody and independent staking.
Institutional control over wallets and staking could strengthen Ethereum decentralization.
Buterin predicts privacy tech and zero-knowledge proofs will grow alongside regulation.
Buterin argued that corporate and government demands for self-custody wallets and independent staking will strengthen Ethereum’s decentralization rather than concentrate power.
“Institutions will want to control their own wallets, and even their own staking if they stake ETH. This is actually good for Ethereum staking decentralization,” Buterin wrote.
The prediction challenges assumptions that institutional adoption necessarily leads to centralization.
Buterin framed institutional behavior through game theory and argued that the optimum strategy involves controlling internal operations while resisting external intrusion.
“Institutions are often staffed by highly sophisticated people, who have a much deeper understanding of these issues than regular people and a much deeper will to do something about them,” he wrote.
The trend toward minimizing external trust dependencies will ramp up as corporations and governments seek more guarantees over their operations. However, Buterin distinguished between institutions minimizing their own dependencies versus reducing user sovereignty.
The relationship between “institutions” and “cypherpunk” is complex and needs to be understood properly. In truth, institutions (both governments and corporations) are neither guaranteed friend nor foe.
“That’s the thing that we as the Ethereum community must insist on, and build tools to help people achieve,” he stated.
Buterin cited contrasting examples of institutional approaches: the European Union aggressively supporting open source software while simultaneously pushing legislation mandating encryption backdoors. The US government uses Signal for secure communications while maintaining surveillance legislation.
Stablecoin issuers will seek governance diversification
Buterin predicted that asset issuers will prefer blockchains whose governance avoids excessive influence from any single region, with geopolitical considerations driving these choices.
Governments will push for increased Know Your Customer requirements while privacy tools simultaneously improve through cypherpunk development efforts. “The more realistic equilibrium is that non-KYC’d assets will exist, and ability to use them with strong privacy will grow,” Buterin wrote.
He predicted growing interest in zero-knowledge proofs of funds source over the next decade, creating ideological disputes about appropriate responses.
“I do not believe that cypherpunk requires total hostility to institutions,” Buterin concluded. “Instead, I support a policy that institutions are already used to using against each other: openness to win-win cooperation, but aggressively standing up for our own interests.”
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-9ad11037
· 4h ago
V哥, you're right this time. Institutions really need to control their own power. Centralization actually backfires on them. Instead of saying institutions threaten decentralization, it's more accurate to say they are the biggest driving force.
View OriginalReply0
LonelyAnchorman
· 01-24 17:48
Vitalik's logic is quite interesting. Are institutions actually pushing towards decentralization? It feels like he's suggesting that institutions, in order to protect their own interests, are forced to embrace open systems... This plot twist is quite surprising.
View OriginalReply0
MetaReckt
· 01-24 17:44
Vitalik's words sound quite idealistic, but will institutions really take the initiative to decentralize? I remain skeptical...
View OriginalReply0
rugpull_survivor
· 01-24 17:28
Would large institutions wanting to control their operations actually promote decentralization? I need to think about this logic...
Vitalik Buterin: Institutions will push Ethereum toward more decentralization, not less
Source: Cryptonews Original Title: Vitalik Buterin: Institutions will push Ethereum toward more decentralization, not less Original Link: Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin said institutions seeking control over their own operations will drive decentralization rather than undermine it.
Summary
Buterin argued that corporate and government demands for self-custody wallets and independent staking will strengthen Ethereum’s decentralization rather than concentrate power.
“Institutions will want to control their own wallets, and even their own staking if they stake ETH. This is actually good for Ethereum staking decentralization,” Buterin wrote.
The prediction challenges assumptions that institutional adoption necessarily leads to centralization.
Institutional self-custody reduces external dependencies
Buterin framed institutional behavior through game theory and argued that the optimum strategy involves controlling internal operations while resisting external intrusion.
“Institutions are often staffed by highly sophisticated people, who have a much deeper understanding of these issues than regular people and a much deeper will to do something about them,” he wrote.
The trend toward minimizing external trust dependencies will ramp up as corporations and governments seek more guarantees over their operations. However, Buterin distinguished between institutions minimizing their own dependencies versus reducing user sovereignty.
“That’s the thing that we as the Ethereum community must insist on, and build tools to help people achieve,” he stated.
Buterin cited contrasting examples of institutional approaches: the European Union aggressively supporting open source software while simultaneously pushing legislation mandating encryption backdoors. The US government uses Signal for secure communications while maintaining surveillance legislation.
Stablecoin issuers will seek governance diversification
Buterin predicted that asset issuers will prefer blockchains whose governance avoids excessive influence from any single region, with geopolitical considerations driving these choices.
Governments will push for increased Know Your Customer requirements while privacy tools simultaneously improve through cypherpunk development efforts. “The more realistic equilibrium is that non-KYC’d assets will exist, and ability to use them with strong privacy will grow,” Buterin wrote.
He predicted growing interest in zero-knowledge proofs of funds source over the next decade, creating ideological disputes about appropriate responses.
“I do not believe that cypherpunk requires total hostility to institutions,” Buterin concluded. “Instead, I support a policy that institutions are already used to using against each other: openness to win-win cooperation, but aggressively standing up for our own interests.”