When it comes to stablecoin transfers, most people's first reaction is high Gas fees and long confirmation times. This pain point has been completely solved here on the Plasma public chain. As the native token of this ecosystem, XPL has caused quite a stir in the market with its innovative payment architecture.
The core innovation lies in the introduction of the Paymaster smart contract — making USDT zero-Gas fee transfers a reality, directly lowering the usage barrier for ordinary users. The performance on the first day of mainnet launch alone demonstrates the market's eagerness: over 2 billion USD in stablecoin inflows, TVL soaring to 5.6 billion USD, and the XPL token market cap reaching 13 billion USD, with a peak price of $1.88. This is not a flash in the pan, but a genuine recognition of the differentiated positioning by the market.
From a tokenomics perspective, the design logic of XPL is quite robust. Out of a total supply of 10 billion, 40% is allocated to ecosystem growth, while the shares for the team and investors (each holding 25%) are both locked for the long term, with only 10% available for public issuance. This distribution structure means that the current circulating supply is only 18%, making short-term selling pressure minimal — providing natural support for the price.
Interestingly, it also features a design in its inflation mechanism. To maintain network security, the protocol issues new XPL annually as validator rewards, with the inflation rate gradually decreasing from 5% to a long-term target of 3%. Meanwhile, the improved EIP-1559 burn mechanism is in effect — besides zero-fee USDT basic transfers, DeFi transactions and smart contract calls will also generate burns, creating a dynamic balance between inflation and deflation. This design not only ensures network incentives but also constrains token issuance through the burn mechanism, forming a self-regulating system in principle.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidatedNotStirred
· 33m ago
Zero gas fee transfers are truly amazing, but the data growth is also too outrageous. The market cap hit 13 billion on the first day of the mainnet? Feels a bit fake.
Can the $1.88 high hold? I'm worried it will plunge again after the hype wave dissipates.
Circulating supply is only 18%, which is indeed locked tight. But on the flip side, what happens when it unlocks? There might be a sell-off then.
The deflationary mechanism sounds good, but the key is whether it can truly maintain this balance. Hopefully, it's not just a paper ideal.
Why are there so many unknown sources of money in XPL... Over 2 billion stablecoins flowing in. Is there some institutional backing?
View OriginalReply0
Rugman_Walking
· 8h ago
Zero Gas fee transfers indeed hit a pain point, but with a market cap of $13 billion so quickly... we'll have to see how the subsequent market support ability performs.
View OriginalReply0
HorizonHunter
· 9h ago
Zero gas fees? Sounds good, but I don't believe it can last
XPL's recent surge is quite fierce, but with only 18% circulation, it feels like it will get bloody later
Paymaster has been tried before, so why does it work this time?
With a total supply of 10 billion locked up so much, it still depends on how the ecosystem develops later
Listening to the burn mechanism is just talk; what really supports the price is still the usage by people
The mainnet's first-day data looks good, but what if the ecosystem cools down?
Circulating pressure is low, but the real show is when investor shares are unlocked
View OriginalReply0
NFTPessimist
· 9h ago
Zero gas fees sound pretty great, but how long can this model last? Someone has to pay the bill eventually.
Wait, the market cap hit 13 billion on the first day. Isn't that a bit too enthusiastic?
The circulating supply is only 18%. It might look pretty bad when more tokens are unlocked later.
The Paymaster logic is indeed well thought out, but I wonder if it can withstand real market shocks.
Talking about self-regulation, but I feel like it's still a new story that's being told more convincingly.
When it comes to stablecoin transfers, most people's first reaction is high Gas fees and long confirmation times. This pain point has been completely solved here on the Plasma public chain. As the native token of this ecosystem, XPL has caused quite a stir in the market with its innovative payment architecture.
The core innovation lies in the introduction of the Paymaster smart contract — making USDT zero-Gas fee transfers a reality, directly lowering the usage barrier for ordinary users. The performance on the first day of mainnet launch alone demonstrates the market's eagerness: over 2 billion USD in stablecoin inflows, TVL soaring to 5.6 billion USD, and the XPL token market cap reaching 13 billion USD, with a peak price of $1.88. This is not a flash in the pan, but a genuine recognition of the differentiated positioning by the market.
From a tokenomics perspective, the design logic of XPL is quite robust. Out of a total supply of 10 billion, 40% is allocated to ecosystem growth, while the shares for the team and investors (each holding 25%) are both locked for the long term, with only 10% available for public issuance. This distribution structure means that the current circulating supply is only 18%, making short-term selling pressure minimal — providing natural support for the price.
Interestingly, it also features a design in its inflation mechanism. To maintain network security, the protocol issues new XPL annually as validator rewards, with the inflation rate gradually decreasing from 5% to a long-term target of 3%. Meanwhile, the improved EIP-1559 burn mechanism is in effect — besides zero-fee USDT basic transfers, DeFi transactions and smart contract calls will also generate burns, creating a dynamic balance between inflation and deflation. This design not only ensures network incentives but also constrains token issuance through the burn mechanism, forming a self-regulating system in principle.