DUSK's privacy smart contract platform is quite interesting. What impressed me the most is that it clarifies the contradiction between privacy and execution efficiency — traditional solutions are always a dilemma: either full privacy features but slow contract execution, or fast execution but compromised privacy protection.



DUSK's approach is different. RUSK, as the core execution framework, directly integrates cryptographic heavyweights like PLONK zero-knowledge proof circuits, Poseidon hashing, and BLS signatures. Developers writing contracts don't need to manually handle encryption logic, just like using native APIs. Coupled with Pie Crust's optimization of WASM bytecode — which is quite critical — translating code into zero-knowledge-friendly intermediate representations and eliminating redundant computations.

I have deployed a privacy derivative contract that includes oracle verification and anonymous settlement processes. Compilation and deployment took only 12ms, with a single execution call only 3.7ms, and gas costs are 60% lower compared to other privacy contract solutions. All contract data is encrypted throughout; even if nodes are compromised, they can only see ciphertext. Zero-knowledge proofs also allow third parties to verify the legality of execution results, meaning regulators can verify compliance without parsing contract details.

The development experience is also good — supporting mainstream WASM tools, writing in Rust, then directly compiling and deploying with almost zero adaptation cost. However, I encountered a pitfall: during deployment, I didn't configure RUSK's consensus keys, which caused signature verification failures. I later realized that I needed to export the consensus.keys file via rusk-wallet to the specified directory and set a password to run normally.

From an application perspective, privacy derivative trading for financial institutions is particularly well-suited for this solution — contracts automatically execute settlement logic, transaction data remains confidential, and regulators can verify compliance through zero-knowledge proofs. It’s clear that this is not just a simple feature stack but a design truly aimed at large-scale privacy contract deployment scenarios.
DUSK-20,65%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ParanoiaKingvip
· 12h ago
Wow, this performance data is a bit outrageous. Is 3.7ms real?
View OriginalReply0
ShibaMillionairen'tvip
· 12h ago
12ms deployment, 3.7ms execution, this data is impressive. Privacy contracts are finally no longer snail-paced.
View OriginalReply0
CexIsBadvip
· 12h ago
12ms compilation and deployment, 3.7ms execution... Bro, this performance really beats other privacy solutions. But the consensus key issue is real; I’ve stepped on that landmine too 😅 Gas fees are reduced by 60%, which is a bold claim; it depends on what you’re comparing it to. But the idea of privacy + regulatory compliance is indeed innovative. Have you actually used it? On which chain was it deployed, and how is the stability? This solution has a pretty good chance of being implemented in financial scenarios, after all, compliance verification can be handled. Just wondering how the ecosystem development will keep up...
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)