2026-01-22 05:22:34

Recently participated in a creator activity, and the rules seem pretty good — you can post 5 posts a day to accumulate points. But after two days, I realized where the real trap is: if the post's exposure doesn't meet the standard, you won't earn any points.

Now I'm a bit confused—how many views do I need to cross this threshold? If it stays like this, I guess I can only be a qualified participant and won't get more rewards.

By the way, I want to ask everyone—this 30% prize pool in the activity, is it evenly distributed among all participants? Or is there some other distribution logic? If anyone knows the secret, please help clarify.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

5 Likes

Reward
5
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SelfSovereignSteve

· 01-22 05:52

This is a typical pump-and-dump scheme, superficially low threshold but actually full of traps. The matter of hitting the exposure target... frankly, it depends on the platform's mood. 30% prize pool? Uh... I guess the big share is eaten up by the top accounts, haha. Honestly, I advise you not to invest too much energy; these kinds of activities are mostly just hype. How can anyone still believe in equal distribution? Web3 has taught us this many times. Currently, none of the creator activities are transparent. I pass on activities where the specific numbers are unclear. Point systems are just IQ taxes; I’ve been caught by this before. Such rules that are not clear-cut should be abandoned directly; wasting time is not worth it.

View OriginalReply0

RooftopReserver

· 01-22 05:52

This is another type of activity that looks simple but is actually a hidden trap, with exposure thresholds killing participation. Wait, is the 30% prize pool again based on popularity ranking? Equal distribution has long been a illusion. After all this effort, it's still all about traffic; without popularity, it's all in vain. I'm really a bit tired of these activities. Posting every day but seeing no exposure, it's better to try elsewhere. What exactly is the threshold? Has anyone figured out the rules?

View OriginalReply0

MEVSupportGroup

· 01-22 05:50

Oh my, isn't this just a wolf in sheep's clothing? The standards for exposure are never transparent. Really, this kind of activity is too manipulative, with one set of rules on the surface and another behind the scenes. This is gambling. They might as well just say whether they like your content or not.

View OriginalReply0

NFTArchaeologist

· 01-22 05:48

This is a typical word game. It looks simple but is actually full of tricks. No one has clearly explained the threshold issue at all. I guess they just want you to free-ride on the traffic. The 30% prize pool definitely isn't split evenly. I've never seen a truly fair activity like this. Another "seemingly simple but actually hidden trap" gameplay. Be careful not to get chopped into chives. Exposure volume is stuck, this move is brilliant, making sure you can never get real money.

View OriginalReply0

GweiObserver

· 01-22 05:30

It's the same trick again, looks bright on the surface but actually all hidden thresholds. The exposure volume is stuck, right? I've also encountered this kind of nonsense. I'm also curious about the 30% prize pool part; it doesn't seem to be this evenly distributed. These activities are all like this; the ones who really make money are never the ordinary participants.

View OriginalReply0

MEVSandwich

· 01-22 05:25

This is that kind of "looks easy but actually tricky" activity again... The exposure threshold is never clearly explained, a typical case of muddying the waters. The 30% prize pool also seems to be divided based on popularity, with the top players taking the biggest share anyway.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropDreamBreaker

· 01-22 05:24

My God, this is a classic example of a numbers game. It looks simple but is actually a trap. Exposure volume is stuck, the 30% prize pool distribution rule is still a mystery, a bit shady. This event design is getting more and more outrageous; there's no way to make money. No way, are people really falling for this trick? I saw through it long ago. The 30% prize pool is definitely not evenly distributed. These kinds of activities never lose money; it's just an algorithm black box. The problem is that the platform simply doesn't want to tell you the specific threshold, deliberately holding back. I think I'll pass. These creator activities are too deep; not worth the hassle. Who the hell set the exposure volume standards? This is too mystical. The prize pool distribution is completely opaque, a typical tactic to cut the leeks.

View OriginalReply0