2026-01-22 04:24:33

Recently, there has been a noticeable shift in community discussions about DUSK—from early price speculation to in-depth considerations of its staking system and token design. As an observer who has long focused on privacy computing and underlying blockchain protocols, this transformation is worth a detailed discussion.

Especially under the operational environment of the mainnet in 2026, DUSK's token model is demonstrating its true potential from its initial design.

**The Merits of SBA Consensus and Node Scarcity**

DUSK adopts the Segregated Byzantine Agreement (SBA) consensus mechanism, which has a unique feature—it doesn't simply stack more nodes, but optimizes the validation process through carefully designed node selection and privacy protection. Unlike traditional PoS, nodes participating in SBA validation maintain a high level of anonymity on-chain, which is particularly important for financial transaction scenarios.

The most attention-grabbing aspect currently is the rapid growth in node staking scale. Once the mainnet connects to real trading platforms like NPEX, the source of node rewards undergoes a qualitative change—it no longer relies solely on the distribution of newly issued tokens, but begins to directly extract transaction fees from real securities trades on the chain. This means the project has officially entered the so-called "Real Yield" phase, producing genuine and sustainable cash flow. In the 2026 market cycle, few projects will be able to achieve this.

**Piecrust Virtual Machine: Why DUSK Is Faster**

Many are curious about why DUSK’s privacy solutions perform well. The answer lies in its self-developed Piecrust virtual machine. This VM is optimized from top to bottom for zero-knowledge proof computations—not by simply adding a privacy module onto a general-purpose EVM, but by considering the characteristics of ZK calculations at the architectural level. The efficiency improvements brought by this deep customization are significant.

The project has developed a complete solution that combines privacy computing with transaction settlement. As the node staking base grows and participation increases, the network’s stability and throughput also improve. This creates a positive feedback loop—more stable networks attract more applications, which in turn generate more real transaction fees, continually reinforcing participants’ revenue expectations.

DUSK-14,69%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

4 Likes

Reward
4
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeSurvivor

· 20h ago

Really, the shift from price speculation to researching staking design is very healthy. --- Regarding Real Yield, it's correct, but the question is how many projects can truly support it? --- Piecrust's optimization of ZK computation has not been easy; now it depends on whether the mainnet can go live. --- In simple terms, it still depends on how much real trading volume NPEX can attract after integration; just dreaming is useless. --- Privacy + performance at the same time is indeed rare, but the credibility can only be verified by 2026. --- Is the rapid growth of node staking true? It still feels like a niche project approach. --- The positive feedback theory sounds good, but the key is how long it can be maintained. --- From anonymity design to fee extraction, this business logic is actually quite good and worth following up. --- Piecrust's self-developed virtual machine is a highlight; it's more solid than those patchwork solutions. --- Many projects have hyped Real Yield, but they all ended in failure. Why can DUSK be different?

View OriginalReply0

SellLowExpert

· 20h ago

Really? The concept of Real Yield is getting tired, and we're just waiting for 2026. --- Piecrust virtual machine sounds pretty hardcore, but whether the performance is good or not has to wait for on-chain data to tell. --- Node anonymity is indeed something I haven't seen others do like this; it's quite interesting. --- Staking rewards shifting from air to actual transaction fees makes sense, but the premise is that NPEX can really handle the volume. --- Positive feedback sounds good, I just want to know when we can see real on-chain data. --- No hype, no blackening; the path of privacy + performance is indeed being explored, DUSK counts as one. --- It's 2026 again. How long does this cycle have to wait, brother? --- The design of anonymous nodes in SBA consensus indeed has innovative ideas compared to PoS. --- The Real Yield phase sounds beautiful, but the question is about the application ecosystem—still a shell. --- Piecrust's architecture optimizes ZK, not just hard-coding modules, I agree, but ordinary users won't feel it either.

View OriginalReply0

MEVSandwich

· 20h ago

After watching for a while, isn't it just about saying that the scarcity of nodes generates real returns? This logic has been played out long ago. Real Yield is getting tiresome to listen to. Has it really been successfully implemented? Piecrust's optimization of ZK has some substance, but is the performance ceiling already set? Let's wait until NPEX is truly connected. The more they boast now, the more I feel hesitant.

View OriginalReply0

SerumSurfer

· 21h ago

Really, I'm tired of those arguments that only shout about price. DUSK's transition from hype to practical application is indeed worth paying attention to. --- Piecrust Virtual Machine feels like it's genuinely solving problems rather than just talking on paper. Unlike some projects that are just虚假. --- Wait, can real yield really be implemented? I mean, can transaction fees support the entire ecosystem? --- The design of node anonymity is quite interesting; the combination of privacy and financial scenarios seems to really require this kind of effort. --- To put it simply, projects that can still generate real cash flow in 2026 are few and far between. If DUSK can really achieve this, it’s no longer just hype. --- I understand the logic of positive feedback, but the premise is that platforms like NPEX must truly integrate. Otherwise, everything is just empty talk. --- I just want to know if it's too late to enter DUSK now. It feels like the discussion has gone deep, and the price should have reflected that quite a bit. --- ZK computation optimization is indeed DUSK's core competitive advantage. It's far better than those projects that just superficially add privacy.

View OriginalReply0