Recently, the discussion around the privacy track has been heating up, and there's a phenomenon worth considering: the current transparency of on-chain transactions is indeed a double-edged sword. On one hand, information disclosure enhances security; on the other hand, the complete exposure of personal financial data also brings privacy risks. Especially at the stage where RWA (Real-World Asset on Chain) is about to be widely implemented, how to ensure privacy while meeting compliance requirements has become a core challenge for technical teams to solve.
One project has an interesting approach—it is not simply creating a "privacy coin," but is specifically targeting compliant financial scenarios. In other words, this design can protect transaction privacy at the technical level while allowing regulatory frameworks to operate effectively. The implementation of this concept will be crucial for future institutional-level asset onboarding.
Regarding the technical core of this project, there is a virtual machine architecture called Piecrust. Currently, most ZK solutions on the market face performance bottlenecks, but this engine has undergone significant optimizations—processing speed is noticeably faster. This means that in the future, on-chain trading of securities and handling complex contracts can achieve both privacy protection and transaction efficiency simultaneously.
From the current progress of the project, it has entered a quite critical stage, with the team actively iterating on technology and community interest rising again. For investors looking to find targets in the privacy + compliance track, projects that deeply focus on ZK proofs and aim to solve practical financial problems are indeed worth keeping an eye on.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ForkThisDAO
· 01-22 04:50
Privacy + compliance is definitely a direction that needs to be taken seriously. Once RWA takes off, on-chain data running naked is really not acceptable.
Piecrust's architecture sounds impressive; ZK performance has always been a hard flaw. If it can truly be solved, that would be amazing.
I quite agree with the idea of not doing privacy coins in compliant finance, understanding the boundaries.
This round of technological iteration is quite interesting; we need to keep an eye on it.
However, no matter how good the privacy solutions are, it still depends on whether institutions are willing to buy in.
Transparency and privacy are really hard to reconcile; it depends on how regulators think.
ZK is fast, but can you really vouch for its security? Has it been audited?
Is Hidden aiming to do this? I can't quite see their true progress.
For privacy solutions in compliant finance, it still seems to depend on who can implement it first.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityLarry
· 01-22 04:49
Privacy + compliance is indeed a rare combination, most projects are still busy with their swordplay
---
I've been paying attention to Piecrust's optimization of ZK performance. Only when it truly runs will institutions get involved
---
To put it simply, RWA implementation must solve this issue; otherwise, traditional finance won't come in
---
There are many privacy coins, but those that can meet regulatory requirements are extremely rare, no wonder community interest is rising again
---
The key is to prove that Piecrust is really fast; otherwise, it's just another PPT plan
---
The saying "double-edged sword" is very accurate; transparency and privacy truly cannot be reconciled
---
Institutional-grade assets on the chain definitely require such solutions; otherwise, how to pass the review
View OriginalReply0
ForkMonger
· 01-22 04:44
look, the "privacy + compliance" angle is just governance theater... real disruption doesn't ask for permission first
Reply0
FOMOrektGuy
· 01-22 04:38
Privacy + Compliance is indeed a powerful combination, much more reliable than just privacy coins.
Piecrust's performance optimization sounds promising. If it can truly solve the speed issues of ZK... then there might be real potential.
With RWA implementation imminent, whoever can handle both privacy and regulation will win this round.
The resurgence in community attention is a signal; we should follow up.
Projects like this are worth checking out, not just hype-driven concepts.
Recently, the discussion around the privacy track has been heating up, and there's a phenomenon worth considering: the current transparency of on-chain transactions is indeed a double-edged sword. On one hand, information disclosure enhances security; on the other hand, the complete exposure of personal financial data also brings privacy risks. Especially at the stage where RWA (Real-World Asset on Chain) is about to be widely implemented, how to ensure privacy while meeting compliance requirements has become a core challenge for technical teams to solve.
One project has an interesting approach—it is not simply creating a "privacy coin," but is specifically targeting compliant financial scenarios. In other words, this design can protect transaction privacy at the technical level while allowing regulatory frameworks to operate effectively. The implementation of this concept will be crucial for future institutional-level asset onboarding.
Regarding the technical core of this project, there is a virtual machine architecture called Piecrust. Currently, most ZK solutions on the market face performance bottlenecks, but this engine has undergone significant optimizations—processing speed is noticeably faster. This means that in the future, on-chain trading of securities and handling complex contracts can achieve both privacy protection and transaction efficiency simultaneously.
From the current progress of the project, it has entered a quite critical stage, with the team actively iterating on technology and community interest rising again. For investors looking to find targets in the privacy + compliance track, projects that deeply focus on ZK proofs and aim to solve practical financial problems are indeed worth keeping an eye on.