In the crypto world, everyone knows but pretends not to: when talking about decentralization, TPS, and consensus mechanisms, they turn around and throw data into some centralized cloud service when it comes to storage. This contradiction of "what is said and what is done" might finally be broken with the emergence of new storage solutions.
**Efficiency is the hard truth—why not Arweave and Filecoin**
People often ask, since there are already decentralized storage solutions on the market, why bother paying attention to new projects? The answer is simple: cost.
Traditional on-chain storage mainly has two approaches: either replicate the entire file across multiple nodes (which is prohibitively expensive), or use erasure coding techniques, but data recovery can cause network traffic that will scare you. Now, there is a self-developed solution called Red Stuff, which uses 2D erasure coding to disperse and distribute files across the network. As long as more than 2/3 of the nodes are alive, data can be recovered in minutes. The coolest part? Its replication factor only needs to be 4 to 5 times, whereas some competitors require hundreds of times to ensure security. Storing a large video or AI model with this method can be so cheap that you might suspect a calculation error.
**"Active" storage is the future**
Past storage systems were just warehouses—put data in and that’s it, dead data piled up. But this new approach is different; it turns storage into objects that can truly circulate within the network. Data is no longer passive; it gains "vitality," allowing it to be called upon, processed, and orchestrated across different application scenarios. This is what Web3 truly needs.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-addcaaf7
· 01-23 07:37
Another new project to cut leeks? Red Stuff sounds like a draft from a small team.
---
Cheap is cheap, but the key is whether it's really safe or just another PPT scam.
---
Filecoin didn't trap me, so why would this work?
---
2D erasure coding sounds good, but how to prove it won't run away?
---
The logic is: the previous generation was too expensive, ours is cheap, and the next generation will probably come to cut another wave.
---
Copy factor 4x vs hundreds of times, I've heard this digital game many times.
---
"Vitality" storage? Playing with concepts again. Basically, isn't it just storing data?
---
Feels similar to the Arweave promise back in the day. How's it doing now?
View OriginalReply0
TheShibaWhisperer
· 01-22 11:00
Another story of "We want decentralization" then turning around to rely on AWS, hilarious.
Cost difference by hundreds of times? Alright, I need to see how Red Stuff is actually implemented.
Wait, is it enough for 2/3 of the nodes to be alive? Is this math correct?
View OriginalReply0
Layer2Observer
· 01-22 03:49
2D Erasure Code 4-5x replication factor vs hundreds of times, the numerical comparison is indeed eye-catching. But from the source code perspective, the trade-off between recovery efficiency and network latency still requires actual testing data to speak, and cannot rely solely on theoretical values.
View OriginalReply0
RegenRestorer
· 01-22 03:44
It's the same old story again. Are you daring to claim a breakthrough just because the cost is 4-5 times cheaper? I feel like new projects are coming out every month claiming to be revolutionary, and then what?
View OriginalReply0
StrawberryIce
· 01-22 03:39
Another "cheap" storage solution, can it survive a bear market this time?
View OriginalReply0
WalletsWatcher
· 01-22 03:34
Well said. I'm already tired of projects that constantly shout about decentralization, only to store all their data in AWS. Red Stuff's replication factor being able to be pushed to 4 to 5 times is indeed impressive; Filecoin's system should have been optimized long ago.
In the crypto world, everyone knows but pretends not to: when talking about decentralization, TPS, and consensus mechanisms, they turn around and throw data into some centralized cloud service when it comes to storage. This contradiction of "what is said and what is done" might finally be broken with the emergence of new storage solutions.
**Efficiency is the hard truth—why not Arweave and Filecoin**
People often ask, since there are already decentralized storage solutions on the market, why bother paying attention to new projects? The answer is simple: cost.
Traditional on-chain storage mainly has two approaches: either replicate the entire file across multiple nodes (which is prohibitively expensive), or use erasure coding techniques, but data recovery can cause network traffic that will scare you. Now, there is a self-developed solution called Red Stuff, which uses 2D erasure coding to disperse and distribute files across the network. As long as more than 2/3 of the nodes are alive, data can be recovered in minutes. The coolest part? Its replication factor only needs to be 4 to 5 times, whereas some competitors require hundreds of times to ensure security. Storing a large video or AI model with this method can be so cheap that you might suspect a calculation error.
**"Active" storage is the future**
Past storage systems were just warehouses—put data in and that’s it, dead data piled up. But this new approach is different; it turns storage into objects that can truly circulate within the network. Data is no longer passive; it gains "vitality," allowing it to be called upon, processed, and orchestrated across different application scenarios. This is what Web3 truly needs.