A steady profit is really just one thing—repeatedly capitalizing on high-probability events.



Last week, a fan asked me: "I followed your strategy three times, two small gains and one small loss. Isn't that probability too low?" I responded by asking him: "If you flip a coin three times in a row, can you guarantee all heads?" He was stumped.

This principle sounds simple, but it is the true root of why most people lose money. Their mistake is one—mistaking short-term fluctuations for patterns, and chance for certainty. I have survived three bull and bear cycles in the high-volatility market of ZKP, relying on this very mindset. Today, I want to be honest with everyone and share.

**The First Lesson of Probabilistic Thinking: Admit Ignorance**

When I first entered the market, I was also obsessed, constantly pondering whether there was a "holy grail indicator" that could accurately predict rises and falls. The crash in 2018 woke me up—it showed me that the market doesn’t operate that way. Essentially, it’s a game of probability; the only certainty is uncertainty itself.

How should I think about it? Imagine yourself as a top poker player:

- Focus not on the outcome of a single hand, but on the total profit after 100 hands
- Bet big when holding good cards, and immediately fold when facing unfavorable situations
- Always base decisions on expected value, not luck

Let me speak with my real trading data. I have a ZKP breakthrough strategy with a win rate of only 58%, but the profit factor reaches 1.8. In other words, for every unit of risk taken, I can expect to recover 1.8 units in the long run. As long as I keep executing this logic, time will naturally allow mathematical principles to work.

**The Three Pillars of Systematic Trading**

The first is to find a probability advantage. Many traders dream of a 90% win rate, but they end up wiped out by rare black swan events. My strategy library includes a trend-following system with a win rate of only 35%. It sounds unimpressive, but its net profit data over the past three years is no joke. A low win rate isn’t scary; what’s scary is an insufficient profit factor—that’s the key.
ZKP0,08%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GweiWatchervip
· 12h ago
A 58% win rate can earn 1.8 times. This data indeed defies those who boast about 90%... Persistence is the true winning mindset.
View OriginalReply0
JustAnotherWalletvip
· 12h ago
An 58% win rate with a 1.8 profit factor is truly surviving; many people are still dreaming of that perfect 90% strategy.
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyBrovip
· 12h ago
58% win rate with a 1.8 profit factor. This data sounds genuine, unlike those guys who boast about a 90% win rate.
View OriginalReply0
InscriptionGrillervip
· 12h ago
Coin theory sounds comfortable, but I still want to see on-chain data. To put it simply, only those who live long enough have the probabilities on their side. The little guys get wiped out trying to hit a big one. 58% win rate with a 1.8x multiplier—if this data is real, it's indeed top-notch. The only concern is whether the data is cherry-picked. I've also been involved in that wave of ZKP; those who survive are indeed following this approach. Admitting ignorance is better than anything else. There's no problem with the profit logic; the key is that persistence is the hardest part. Most people give up after the fifth heartbreak.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleMistakervip
· 12h ago
The analogy of coins is excellent, but to be honest, I still get easily brainwashed by short-term fluctuations... I need to gradually understand the concept of profit factors.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)