Recently, while organizing the current state of the infrastructure track, I suddenly realized a thought-provoking question: in the era of L1 public chains reaching the sky, where exactly is the so-called "moat"? Is it just about stacking TPS data? Or can it truly solve the practical pain points of enterprise users?
I shifted my focus away from those all-in-one public chains and carefully examined Vanar's architectural design, only to discover that the market might have overlooked something—how "verticalization" and "compliance" will weigh in the upcoming cycle.
I've been pondering how Web2 giants are entering Web3. For large entertainment IPs and consumer brands, the fundamental reasons for their hesitation boil down to two: uncontrollable costs and ESG environmental concerns. That’s why I think Vanar Chain deserves serious attention. It doesn’t boast grand stories; instead, it pragmatically dives into the niche but massive field of "entertainment and mainstream adoption."
While digging into Vanar’s tech stack, two details sharply heightened my professional sensitivity.
One is the economic model. For developers and enterprises, gas fee volatility is a major obstacle to bringing business logic on-chain. Vanar’s efforts in cost optimization, in my view, are not just technical upgrades but a dimensionality reduction in business thinking—eliminating users’ "blockchain friction," which is the real key to large-scale adoption.
The other is the environmental story. Some might see this as just marketing fluff, but in the institutional investment logic I’ve encountered, carbon footprint has become a hard metric. An infrastructure with a built-in green label can precisely serve those traditional large funds stuck by ESG regulations but eager to enter the crypto market.
Today’s market noise is overwhelming, with everyone chasing the latest trends. But if you take a step back and look at the fundamentals, the infrastructure competition has entered the second half—shifting from "performance stacking" to "application scenario implementation." Vanar, by connecting tech giants like Google Cloud, has built a highly targeted ecological closed loop.
The future winners may not necessarily have the most explosive technical parameters, but they will be those that enable the smoothest migration of traditional business logic onto the chain. From what I see now, Vanar is somewhat like a key node connecting these two parallel worlds.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ProbablyNothing
· 9h ago
It sounds like another new savior narrative, but I did take a serious look at Vanar's approach. It's definitely more clear-headed than those public chains that talk about TPS all day long.
The point about gas fee fluctuations hindering commercial implementation is valid, but I still have my doubts about ESG hard metrics. Will traditional finance really rush in just because of green labels?
Focusing on the vertical track is the right path, but I'm just worried it might turn into just storytelling again.
By the way, can the connection with Google Cloud be elaborated on? Feels a bit vague.
Early on, it was described this way. Let's see when real users come on board.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 9h ago
It sounds like just another overhyped infrastructure, but the stability of gas fees really hits the pain point.
I'm convinced about ESG; traditional capital is on board with this. However, whether it can truly be implemented depends on subsequent developments.
Vertical tracks are more reliable than broad ones; this logic makes sense.
View OriginalReply0
MEVictim
· 9h ago
Compliance is indeed easy to overlook, but it is truly decisive.
The issue of ESG bottlenecks is spot on; traditional big capital simply won't touch high-risk areas.
Focusing on vertical tracks is more reliable than a broad approach. What happened to those previous multi-chain dreams?
The fluctuation of Gas fees hits the point—no one wants to go on-chain and then have to do economic calculations.
Green labels = unlocking institutional funding; this logic makes sense.
At the end of the day, public chains are not competing on TPS but on ecosystem coherence.
Google Cloud's endorsement indeed provides confidence.
View OriginalReply0
TaxEvader
· 9h ago
To be honest, I agree with this logic—TPS stacking has long been a false demand. Right now, it's about who can seamlessly adopt Web2's business models.
Vertical integration has indeed been seriously underestimated; not every chain needs to do everything.
I'm a bit skeptical about the ESG aspect. It feels more like a gimmick than substance. Can it really block traditional large funds?
However, Vanar's cost optimization approach really hits the pain point. If they can't get past the Gas fee issue, even the best ecosystem is useless.
Even players like Google show that the direction is correct; now it's just a matter of whether the subsequent ecosystem development can keep up.
View OriginalReply0
ShibaMillionairen't
· 10h ago
Vertical tracks are indeed more resilient than just piling up data, I agree with that. But can the ESG approach really attract large funds? It still seems that implementation is the key to making it count.
Recently, while organizing the current state of the infrastructure track, I suddenly realized a thought-provoking question: in the era of L1 public chains reaching the sky, where exactly is the so-called "moat"? Is it just about stacking TPS data? Or can it truly solve the practical pain points of enterprise users?
I shifted my focus away from those all-in-one public chains and carefully examined Vanar's architectural design, only to discover that the market might have overlooked something—how "verticalization" and "compliance" will weigh in the upcoming cycle.
I've been pondering how Web2 giants are entering Web3. For large entertainment IPs and consumer brands, the fundamental reasons for their hesitation boil down to two: uncontrollable costs and ESG environmental concerns. That’s why I think Vanar Chain deserves serious attention. It doesn’t boast grand stories; instead, it pragmatically dives into the niche but massive field of "entertainment and mainstream adoption."
While digging into Vanar’s tech stack, two details sharply heightened my professional sensitivity.
One is the economic model. For developers and enterprises, gas fee volatility is a major obstacle to bringing business logic on-chain. Vanar’s efforts in cost optimization, in my view, are not just technical upgrades but a dimensionality reduction in business thinking—eliminating users’ "blockchain friction," which is the real key to large-scale adoption.
The other is the environmental story. Some might see this as just marketing fluff, but in the institutional investment logic I’ve encountered, carbon footprint has become a hard metric. An infrastructure with a built-in green label can precisely serve those traditional large funds stuck by ESG regulations but eager to enter the crypto market.
Today’s market noise is overwhelming, with everyone chasing the latest trends. But if you take a step back and look at the fundamentals, the infrastructure competition has entered the second half—shifting from "performance stacking" to "application scenario implementation." Vanar, by connecting tech giants like Google Cloud, has built a highly targeted ecological closed loop.
The future winners may not necessarily have the most explosive technical parameters, but they will be those that enable the smoothest migration of traditional business logic onto the chain. From what I see now, Vanar is somewhat like a key node connecting these two parallel worlds.