2026-01-21 20:21:47

In the privacy blockchain sector, projects are showcasing their unique strengths. Dusk has taken an interesting approach—not solely pursuing anonymity, but focusing on the concept of "auditable privacy."

From a technical perspective, Dusk employs a unique dual VM architecture combined with an isolated Byzantine consensus mechanism. The benefits of this combination are clear: transaction confirmation can be achieved in seconds. Additionally, through confidential smart contracts, project teams can hide key information, protecting user privacy while also meeting compliance requirements—such a balance is rare in the privacy sector.

The DUSK token itself is designed quite practically. Staking is used to secure network stability, pay transaction fees, and enable governance voting rights—covering three aspects to create real demand for circulation. The issuance cycle is set at 36 years, with a four-year halving mechanism. This arrangement clearly considers the long-term sustainability of the ecosystem.

Progress has also been made on the ecosystem side. It has attracted institutional investors like Tether’s parent company, indicating market recognition of this direction. The mainnet’s EVM compatibility also lowers the barrier for developers to get involved, naturally attracting capital and creative ideas.

DUSK-18,38%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DegenDreamer

· 01-22 12:42

The concept of auditable privacy really resonated with me. Compared to purely anonymous projects, this approach is smarter. Seconds-level confirmation + confidential contracts, this combination is indeed powerful. Achieving both compliance and privacy is not easy. A 36-year issuance cycle is quite bold; it seems they're planning to play the long game. The capital behind Tether has all come in, indicating that this direction isn't just empty talk.

View OriginalReply0

MoonWaterDroplets

· 01-21 20:51

Auditable privacy is indeed a good idea, much more practical than those projects that constantly shout "absolute anonymity." Confirming in seconds sounds a bit exaggerated, can it really hold up? Tether's endorsement definitely adds points, but has the ecosystem really taken off? Feels too early to say. Using dual VMs plus Byzantine technology stack, can compliance and privacy truly be balanced, or is it just another PPT architecture? A 36-year issuance cycle is somewhat impressive, at least it's not a pump-and-dump rhythm aimed at harvesting retail investors. EVM compatibility is a smart decision; lowering the barrier to entry will attract more users. After this round of funding, can the token economy actually run smoothly, or will it become another air project? It feels like a gamble on a regulatory attitude shift; privacy coins are inherently a sensitive track.

View OriginalReply0

ForeverBuyingDips

· 01-21 20:47

Auditable privacy sounds good, but how many can truly be implemented? --- Dual VM architecture for second-level confirmation—if that's real, it's incredible. --- Tether's backing definitely boosts confidence, but let's wait and see how the ecosystem develops. --- The balancing act of compliant privacy—it's easy to talk about, but hard to execute. --- A 36-year issuance cycle... Is this betting on long-term faith or just procrastination? --- EVM compatibility lowering the barrier is reliable; developers will follow suit. --- Confidential contracts are indeed a promising idea, but I'm worried it might just be another PPT project. --- Staking, transaction fees, governance—these three functions have stabilized the fundamentals. --- With so many projects in the privacy track, what makes Dusk stand out and break through? --- I believe in second-level transactions, but can privacy and auditability be achieved simultaneously? That's a bit uncertain.

View OriginalReply0

OnChainDetective

· 01-21 20:45

ngl the "auditable privacy" angle is just regulatory theater dressed up in tech jargon... transaction pattern analysis will expose everything anyway, historical data proves it.

Reply0

WenAirdrop

· 01-21 20:44

Auditable privacy? This idea is indeed a bit different and more reliable than just hiding and seeking. The capital behind Tether has arrived, indicating that this track has potential. Dual VM plus privacy, seconds-level confirmation, this part is solid. Token design is the key; a 36-year issuance cycle shows long-term thinking. EVM compatibility directly lowers the barrier, and the ecosystem will naturally develop.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeTherapist

· 01-21 20:33

Auditable privacy? Sounds pretty good, but I'm just worried it's another PPT project. Privacy chains are everywhere, and Dusk's approach to balance is indeed rare. Dual VM plus Byzantine consensus—sounds impressive, but can it actually run? Tether's backing isn't enough; let's see if the ecosystem can really come to life. A 36-year cycle? Bro, are you playing chess here? 秒级确认 (second-level confirmation) I believe in, but the key is how much TPS can it handle. Another old routine of compliant privacy—feels a bit contradictory. Is EVM compatibility considered innovation? It feels too much like copy-paste. Honestly, I'm not very interested in these balanced projects; I always feel neither side is pushed to the extreme. Institutional investment coming in—does that mean it's definitely reliable? I remain skeptical.

View OriginalReply0

HypotheticalLiquidator

· 01-21 20:26

Seconds-level confirmation sounds good, but can the 36-year issuance cycle last until then... The path of compliance and privacy is too crowded, once the risk control threshold is breached, the entire ecosystem is a domino effect. --- The dual VM architecture seems balanced, but systemic risks are hidden; lending rates spike and vulnerabilities are exposed. --- Is Tether entering? Is this a signal or a prelude to cashing out... Be cautious. --- EVM compatibility lowers the barrier, but ecosystem expansion also brings chain reactions of liquidation risks, which no one is paying attention to. --- Confidential smart contracts are called compliant, but at their core, they still rely on the liquidation price logic. Once the deleveraging cycle hits, everything is doomed. --- 36 years halving? It sounds long-term, but in reality, many projects won't survive the next bear market. Don't be brainwashed by sustainability narratives. --- Staking protection, transaction fees, voting rights... They sound nice, but when market sentiment reverses, all these demands are fake.

View OriginalReply0

FOMOmonster

· 01-21 20:22

The logic of auditable privacy indeed addresses the contradiction between regulation and privacy. Dusk's move is quite insightful. 秒级确认+机密合约 sounds like a solid tech stack, but the ecosystem hasn't taken off yet. Tether's endorsement certainly boosts confidence, but it still depends on whether the mainnet can truly attract developers. A 36-year issuance cycle... how long will it take to see results? To be honest, the privacy track is full of pitfalls, and Dusk's approach is more pragmatic than pure privacy coins.

View OriginalReply0