2026-01-21 20:21:08

There have indeed been many sparks of collision between AI and blockchain recently, but most projects are just simple feature combinations. However, Vanar Chain's approach clearly goes further — from its inception, it has been pondering how to truly integrate AI into the blockchain ecosystem.

I really appreciate this point. Instead of using AI as a marketing gimmick, it's better to seriously consider what kind of operating environment AI needs as a system participant. An honest and pragmatic attitude is actually quite rare in this industry.

Take its transaction cost design as an example. The core goal is to provide certainty for AI agents. What does predictable fees mean? For programs that require long-term automatic operation, this is crucial. Being able to plan expenses in advance allows the system to make decisions more calmly.

The sorting mechanism adopts a first-come, first-served approach rather than an auction, which is also interesting. Bidding models have too many uncontrollable factors, and AI can easily face decision-making difficulties in such environments. Simplifying the rules actually makes interactions smoother.

The team has extensive experience in gaming and entertainment, which gives them an understanding of how to design engaging experiences. Bringing this set of features into the Web3 ecosystem indeed provides a unique perspective for the project.

Looking at its ecosystem layout, it touches on mainstream sectors like gaming, metaverse, and brand applications. Ready-made products like Virtua Metaverse Platform and VGN Gaming Network demonstrate one thing — this is not just talk, but real development.

They have also invested quite a bit in security. Whether a public chain is stable, and whether high-value applications and AI agents can be used with confidence, depends on the reliability of the infrastructure. In the long run, these investments are worthwhile. Many developers and community members are attracted by this vision because the project does not follow short-term hype but steadily builds the infrastructure.

VANRY-7,72%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CodeZeroBasis

· 17h ago

The predictability of costs really resonated with me, much more reliable than those flashy marketing tactics. First-come, first-served is truly smarter than bidding auctions; AI needs this kind of certainty. But to be honest, no matter how perfect the ecosystem is, without users it's all pointless. How do we attract users now? Finally seeing a team that doesn't just talk about AI and blockchain integration but actually acts. Security investments are indeed necessary; otherwise, who would dare to deploy high-value applications? A team with a background in gaming tracks developing a public chain—this approach is indeed a bit different.

View OriginalReply0

SandwichTrader

· 01-23 09:56

Cost predictability is indeed key; AI automation trading is just afraid of this kind of uncertainty. Only certainty can allow the program to make decisions; I buy this logic. But it really depends on whether they can survive in the future. These days, there are too many projects that claim to be practical, but they all end up dropping out. Vanar is a bit interesting this time; at least it's not just pure marketing. Game background combined with blockchain—this combination is indeed fresh. First-come, first-served is much more enjoyable than bidding; finally someone gets the pain point of AI. Security investment? I'm paying attention to this; the stability of the public chain directly affects whether agents can use it. Honestly, if the project team is willing to spend money on infrastructure, it's worth observing. No black spots can be found, at least the sincerity is visible.

View OriginalReply0

Blockblind

· 01-21 20:51

The predictability of costs really hits the mark, much better than chains where gas fees suddenly explode. Really, another AI+chain project, but this time it doesn't seem to be fooling around. First come, first served > bidding, simple and straightforward, AI loves this approach. From a gaming background? No wonder the interactive experience is so refined. Virtua and VGN are both alive and well, definitely not just in name. Such substantial security investment? Interesting, need to keep an eye on it. The team structure is indeed different, no daily hype about concepts. At least they're building something, not just pure fundraising narratives. This approach is much more developer-friendly. But whether it can really take off depends on the execution moving forward. Solid infrastructure is the long-term foundation.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoSourGrape

· 01-21 20:40

If I had known that Vanar would take infrastructure so seriously, I wouldn't have put my money into those worthless coins...

View OriginalReply0

MetaLord420

· 01-21 20:28

Indeed, just shouting AI + blockchain is too easy. Few projects truly put effort into refining the details of the fee model. Vanar doesn't seem to be just hyping concepts, which is worth paying attention to.

View OriginalReply0

ProofOfNothing

· 01-21 20:28

Alright, finally seeing someone who isn't using AI to cut leeks Indeed, most projects just slap an AI label and start bragging... This guy directly designs the environment for AI from the ground up, still quite hardcore Predictable costs are really a heavy burden for automation programs; AI can't adapt as flexibly as we humans do First come, first served. The bidding system itself is designed for character setting, and AI gets quite confused in it Bringing in the game background with this perspective is quite interesting, not the typical thinking of the pure tech crowd But to be fair, no matter how complete the ecosystem is, it still depends on whether it can really get off the ground; this will depend on what happens next Security investment is definitely necessary; without this foundation, no matter how fancy, it's useless... It depends on how they deliver in the follow-up

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBuilder

· 01-21 20:25

No hype, no negativity, this is indeed much more solid than those concept coins. Wait, is first-come, first-served really better than bidding? Doesn't that mean we have to race internet speed... The game background is interesting, but can it really be developed? I've looked into Virtua, but the key is whether the ecosystem can really come alive. It sounds good, but only real investment can prove everything. This idea makes sense, but most projects still end up as air coins. What's the difference? I agree that predictable fees are friendly to bots, but how can long-term stability be guaranteed? It's always about safety first, I've heard it too many times, but the key is whether it's truly implemented. A reliable team is indeed valuable, but even with a good background in the Web3 circle, it's easy to have a setback. This logic is solid, but I still can't see how it makes a profit...

View OriginalReply0