2026-01-21 20:20:32

My recent view on small-cap projects has changed. I no longer follow narrative stories blindly. Now I focus on one thing—whether real traces can be left on the chain.

When I re-examined Vanar Chain, I didn't look at the price trend first but at browser data. The total transaction count has already reached the 190 million level, the number of addresses is stable at around 28 million, and the block height is also quite impressive. What do these numbers indicate? The network is at least genuinely operational, not just running in vain. But that's not enough—I care more about whether the growth can be sustained. A sudden spike might come from promotional activities, wash trading, or short-term hype of a certain application. I no longer want to participate in that noise.

The second perspective is the chain's identity setting. Vanar's Chain ID is 2040, and the native fuel token is $VANRY. It sounds like a small detail, but it's crucial for developer onboarding and wallet compatibility. A chain with chaotic infrastructure, no matter how much AI or applications it promotes, is ultimately nonsense.

The third point is more cautious. The official claims of semantic storage, reasoning engines, and automation tools sound comprehensive, but I won't take them at face value. I will verify using the simplest methods: Is there a clear developer documentation portal? Are there substantial updates on the product page? Are there corresponding interactions on the chain? If I can't verify these three points, I will categorize it as a "vision" rather than "fulfilled."

Regarding $VANRY itself, small-cap tokens are naturally sensitive to market sentiment. I won't be moved by one or two buzzwords, but if the on-chain data and actual applications can show continuous growth for several weeks, I will adjust my valuation expectations. Currently, I am putting it on the watchlist and letting the data speak.

VANRY-4,69%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ShamedApeSeller

· 01-21 20:50

Reliable logic, on-chain data doesn't lie, much more useful than just listening to stories --- 1.9 million transactions sound like a big number, but only sustained growth is worth watching; short-term noise has already become tiresome --- Infrastructure is not clear yet, and talking about AI is pointless; this point is reasonable --- Documentation, updates, and interaction are all necessary; otherwise, it's just a PPT project, and we're tired of it --- Keep it on the watchlist, wait until the data shows continuous performance, don't rush to bet --- Details like chain ID and wallet compatibility are indeed easy to overlook, but they are crucial for genuine developer integration --- Not being swayed by one or two hot words shows a mindset more rational than most small-cap players --- 20 million addresses sound impressive, but it's necessary to verify how many are truly active; there are also many fake transactions and scammers --- Separating the vision from the realized achievements should be standard thinking, but most people can't tell the difference

View OriginalReply0

StableGeniusDegen

· 01-21 20:45

Hey, I love listening to this person's speeches. Finally, someone is not bragging but looking at the data. However, with 190 million transactions, how much of it is just fake volume? Who can really verify this? The documentation is well-made but lacks real ecosystem utility—there are a lot of such cases in Web3. A watchlist is fine, but I also want to see the team's on-chain behavior; that's much more reliable than just talk. $VANRY Small-cap coins like this are often hyped up, but your verification logic is the real deal. Infrastructure is the bottom line; this point is spot on. Everything else is just superficial.

View OriginalReply0

RugpullTherapist

· 01-21 20:44

This guy finally gets it, no longer getting chopped up by stories Data indeed doesn't lie, but I really don't know how many real users are in the 190 million transactions Infrastructure chaos makes all the hype pointless, this hits hard The watchlist is there, but don't just stare at it or you'll end up sleepwalking and buying again, haha

View OriginalReply0

WinterWarmthCat

· 01-21 20:44

I like this set of logic. Without hype or blackening, just look at the actual on-chain activity, which is much more sober than those who tell stories every day. --- 1.9 billion transactions sound good, but I still can't tell the difference between fake volume and real usage. I need to see a few more weeks of data before I dare to act. --- If the infrastructure is poor, talking about AI is pointless. This hits the nail on the head. Too many projects are just good-looking packaging. --- If there are no official documents or product updates, I can only assume they are dreaming. --- Details like Chain ID and fuel tokens are indeed overlooked, but the true nature reveals itself when used for development. --- Waiting to see continuous growth, otherwise VANRY will just be a casual look, don't expect me to follow. --- There aren't many projects that fit this set of criteria. Most die at the "lack of continuous data" stage. --- The vision and the actual achievements should be clear; otherwise, when it comes to cutting the leeks, the biggest loser is always oneself.

View OriginalReply0

TideReceder

· 01-21 20:44

Alright, I agree with this logic. But in 190 million transactions, how many are truly active remains a question mark. Basically, I'm just worried about being misled by stories; we need to look at on-chain data, and be clear on that. A chain with poor infrastructure is useless no matter what is hyped; there's no fault in that statement. Documentation, updates, and interactive behavior—all three need to be in place to count; everything else is just a PowerPoint presentation. Stay on the sidelines during the observation period, wait for data to show continuous growth before taking action—that's a steady attitude.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeWhisperer

· 01-21 20:39

Alright, finally someone hit the nail on the head. On-chain data doesn't lie. However, with 190 million transactions, we need to ask how many are from real users and how many are generated by bots. The vision and the actual implementation are far apart. Don't be fooled by official hype. I like your approach, but I'm worried it might just turn into another narrative gamble in the end. I only believe in sustained data growth for over three months; it's still too early now. Infrastructure isn't in place yet, so all the AI and applications are pointless. You're right about that. Chain ID and wallet compatibility are small issues that are easily overlooked, but they really matter. $VANRY Currently just observing, waiting until the chain really heats up before making any moves. I agree with the validation methods based on documentation, updates, and interaction behaviors—much more reliable than just promises on paper. Buzzwords only deceive new investors; seasoned users are already looking at the data. While 28 million addresses sound impressive, we need to compare with other chains to see the real picture. This cautious attitude is good; small projects are prone to failure, and sustained data growth is the real signal.

View OriginalReply0