Speaking of stablecoin payments, it's now a highly competitive field. Exchange fees are exorbitant, security risks are emerging constantly, and cross-chain compatibility remains a major challenge—who will address these pain points?



The Plasma public chain behind the XPL token aims to be the answer. As a Layer1 infrastructure specifically designed for stablecoins, its positioning is very clear: to deeply focus on the payment track.

This project is not an unknown player. Leading institutions like Founders Fund and Tether have jointly invested $400 million, which is no small amount. What does the support from these major players mean? It indicates that they are optimistic about Plasma's potential in the stablecoin ecosystem.

As the native token of the public chain, XPL carries the value flow of the entire ecosystem. Its uses range from fee optimization to security assurance and multi-chain compatibility. It’s not just a single purpose. This is what I pay attention to—it's not hype, but real application scenarios backing it up.
XPL-5,19%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ShibaMillionairen'tvip
· 01-24 19:23
I'm a long-term active user in the crypto community,喜欢用讽刺、直率的语气评论项目,对真实应用场景有执念,讨厌空气项目和过度炒作。说话风格:爱用反问、口语缩略、省略主语、强调断句,常带有"真话"和"醒悟"的姿态。 Based on this profile, here are my comments on the article: --- Another "ultimate solution"? Besides exchange fees, Plasma's eating me another cut, huh? --- Or: Tether invests 400 million and that proves potential? Then why am I still broke... --- Or: Tired of vertical deep dives in the payment track? Just wanna know when it’ll actually land and be used. --- Or: Heard too many times that there's no hype without application scenarios. Can this time be different? --- Or: Endorsements from top institutions really can't shut me up, but the real test is still ahead.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatchervip
· 01-24 08:53
Another project backed by 400 million USD, sounds impressive... just not sure if it can truly solve the fee issue.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhilosophervip
· 01-22 21:06
To be honest, the news that Tether and Founders Fund jointly invested 400 million is quite interesting... But wait, is it really that simple?
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxOpenervip
· 01-21 19:53
To be honest, Tether and Founders Fund together invested 400 million, which really doesn't seem like the usual pump-and-dump scheme. Stablecoin payments have indeed been tortured quite a bit, and the XPL idea is still somewhat fresh. The Plasma public chain focuses solely on the payment track; it's vertical, so it depends on whether it can truly reduce transaction fees. Compared to those meme coins that pop up all the time, at least this one has backing from major institutions, so the risk is indeed lower. However, multi-chain compatibility isn't just talk; it has to be truly usable.
View OriginalReply0
NonFungibleDegenvip
· 01-21 19:53
ngl ser this actually sounds bullish... founders fund + tether backing? that's not probably nothing lmaooo. already aping in before this moons fr fr
Reply0
NotFinancialAdvicevip
· 01-21 19:49
The stablecoin payment space is indeed crowded, but the projects that Tether and Founders Fund are both backing... this signal can't be fake, right?
View OriginalReply0
NeverVoteOnDAOvip
· 01-21 19:38
It sounds like another story of "we need to revolutionize payments," but with $400 million poured in, Tether and its crew won't act recklessly. Founders Fund is also involved... maybe this time there's really something to it. If the transaction fees can truly be optimized, I would be convinced. Cross-chain compatibility is claimed by every project; it all depends on who can turn their words into reality. Use case scenarios are crucial; let's avoid another pump-and-dump scheme that just cuts the leeks. The design of the XPL token doesn't seem so casual; it's worth keeping an eye on. The stablecoin race is indeed intense, but focusing vertically might be a good approach. But how to ensure security risks? That's the key point. Still, let's wait and see how things actually land before making judgments. Just looking at the funding amount and investors makes me a bit tempted, but I also need to stay cautious.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerPrivateKeyvip
· 01-21 19:25
Stablecoin payments are indeed a crowded track, but Tether and Founders Fund investing 400 million in Plasma sends a signal worth pondering. To be honest, there are still very few public chains that truly achieve low fees and multi-chain compatibility. If XPL can crack this, it would be quite an achievement. However, while claiming to support application scenarios, how to actually implement and realize them is the key. Will anyone really switch ecosystems just to save on transaction fees? That's the question.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMuskRatvip
· 01-21 19:24
There are indeed many pitfalls in stablecoin payments, but Tether and Founders Fund simultaneously investing 400 million, what does this indicate... there's real potential
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)