Speaking of the evolution of the crypto industry over the years, the biggest shift can be summarized in one sentence—moving from hype to practicality. Projects that have survived multiple bull and bear cycles are often not the ones with the most explosive concepts, but those that directly address real-world pain points. Plasma is a typical example; it didn't choose to follow trends or chase hot topics, but instead found a confident development path.



Recent continuous information shows that Plasma has committed all its chips to the stablecoin track, prioritizing efficiency, cost, and usability. Why place such emphasis on stablecoins? Simply put, stablecoins have become the lifeblood of the on-chain world. Think about it—cross-border transfers, fund clearing, market-making transactions, on-chain lending... these high-frequency operations are all inseparable from stablecoins.

However, the harsh reality is that most public blockchains are not designed for high-frequency stablecoin circulation. Network congestion happens from time to time, transaction fees fluctuate arbitrarily, and confirmation times are unpredictable. These issues may seem like technical details, but in fact, they directly block stablecoins from real payment scenarios.

Plasma has recognized this long-overlooked pain point and is determined to make targeted optimizations from the underlying architecture. Instead of pursuing a "big and comprehensive" public chain positioning, Plasma chooses to focus—just doing one thing: making stablecoins run faster on-chain, with lower costs and more stable user experience. Low cost, high throughput, stable operation—these may sound very engineer-oriented, but translated, it means making transfers and settlements simpler, more predictable, and users no longer need to worry about sudden fee spikes or transaction stalls. This design philosophy, centered on actual user experience, precisely addresses the most genuine market needs today.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TokenStormvip
· 6h ago
It sounds quite reasonable, but on-chain data shows that the bottleneck in stablecoin circulation is not that easy to solve. --- Focusing on a single track is a common narrative in every cycle; how long it can last still depends on backtesting data. --- If the miner fee issue isn't resolved, even lower throughput is just talk. I bet Plasma can achieve it, then I'll go all in. --- Basically, it's another L2 narrative. The arbitrage space is limited but it does hit the pain points. FOMOing in isn't impossible. --- The eye of the storm is the safest. I'm betting that this stablecoin narrative can still be hyped for 3 more months. Anyway, I've seen through it all. --- On-chain data shows that these projects have a 35% chance of outperforming the market in the first 3 months, but this time it's not certain. --- The old story of congestion and network fee fluctuations is nothing new. The key is whether it can truly be implemented. I remain skeptical but still bought some.
View OriginalReply0
SneakyFlashloanvip
· 6h ago
Focusing on a specific track is indeed a solid approach, much better than those public chains that try to do everything. The only concern is that it might ultimately turn into another PPT project.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6bc33122vip
· 6h ago
Stablecoins have indeed been stuck for too long. Just shouting slogans isn't enough; I believe in focused approaches like Plasma.
View OriginalReply0
FortuneTeller42vip
· 6h ago
A reliable project should be done this way, not by throwing around empty concepts.
View OriginalReply0
FUD_Vaccinatedvip
· 6h ago
Stablecoins are really competitive right now, but I still believe in the Plasma approach. Focusing on one thing is much better than trying to do everything. Less bragging, more work—that's it. But on the other hand, hearing about low fees all the time, the key is actually being able to deliver predictable results. When the bull and bear cycles come, it all depends on who is still standing. No matter how good the story is, it’s useless. It sounds good, but let’s wait until real scenarios are proven before talking. Right now, everyone is just talking about the stablecoin track.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)