For blockchain to truly enter the regulated financial core, one old problem cannot be avoided—privacy and compliance are like two parallel lines, always difficult to intersect. Public blockchains expose all transaction details—accounts, amounts, contract logic—making transparency a strength for decentralization but a nightmare for financial institutions. Confidential business secrets, counterparties, transaction amounts—these core elements of traditional finance are all publicly available on-chain. Which bank would dare to move its business to such a place?



The other extreme is pure privacy coins. Monero and Zcash use ring signatures and zero-knowledge proofs to hide transactions completely, effectively protecting users. However, the cost is that regulators cannot verify anything, and anti-money laundering (AML), KYC, and other financial bottom lines become meaningless under pure privacy architectures. The result is: financial institutions cannot use them, and regulators refuse them. These coins are forever excluded from the formal financial system.

This is the biggest bottleneck in asset tokenization implementation. It’s not a matter of technology being insufficient, but that no one can meet both sides’ needs simultaneously—protecting transaction confidentiality on one hand, and allowing regulators to see what they need on the other.

Dusk Network’s approach is different. It doesn’t choose between the two; instead, it starts from the underlying protocol. Through cryptographic innovation and compliance primitive design, it creates a technical stack where privacy and compliance can coexist. This is not simply combining two technologies but tailoring solutions to the actual pain points of financial institutions. The result is: on-chain transactions can protect sensitive data while providing regulators and financial institutions with the necessary oversight. The information they need to verify can be verified, and the business details that don’t need to be seen remain black boxes.

The underlying logic needed for financial blockchains is fundamentally different from that of general public chains or privacy coins. It requires a form of selective transparency—transparent to regulators, confidential to competitors. This design philosophy may be the true path that financial blockchain should follow.
ZEC1,13%
DUSK-17,87%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Lonely_Validatorvip
· 3h ago
To be honest, I've heard this logic too many times. The key still depends on who can truly implement it.
View OriginalReply0
HalfIsEmptyvip
· 18h ago
Yes, this approach is indeed correct. Selective transparency is the way to go.
View OriginalReply0
TokenVelocityvip
· 18h ago
In plain terms, it's about having your cake and eating it too; it's indeed quite challenging.
View OriginalReply0
HalfBuddhaMoneyvip
· 18h ago
It's the old story of privacy and compliance, essentially a trade-off between the two.
View OriginalReply0
SoliditySurvivorvip
· 18h ago
At the end of the day, someone has to be the first to take the plunge.
View OriginalReply0
NFTPessimistvip
· 18h ago
Basically, it's still a game of interests; there is no perfect solution.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)