In the context of institutional entry into crypto assets, privacy and compliance are often seen as a paradox. But there is a project that has come up with a new approach.



Dusk takes a different path—unlike other anonymous coins, it integrates privacy and regulation from the ground up. Using PLONK zero-knowledge proofs and Piecrust ZK-VM, transactions are by default privacy-protected, while Citadel zero-knowledge KYC allows users to selectively disclose their identity information. This design directly aligns with the EU MiCA regulations, solving the most headache-inducing compliance issues for traditional financial institutions on the blockchain.

The launch of DuskEVM mainnet this year is crucial; developers no longer need to delve into complex cryptography, enabling faster iteration of compliant financial applications. Coupled with a case of €300 million in securities tokenization and a zero-trust custody solution, the infrastructure for RWA (Real-World Asset) is gradually being solidified.

The chain’s performance layer has also been optimized—SA consensus mechanism supports 10-second settlement, Hyperstaking staking mechanism directly links yields to real on-chain demand, and a 36-year token release cycle from the source prevents inflation dilution.

In simple terms, when RWA moves from PPT (PowerPoint) presentations to real-world implementation, what is needed is this kind of infrastructure solution that understands institutional pain points and can also provide privacy protection.
DUSK5,49%
RWA0,92%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHustlervip
· 9h ago
Can privacy and compliance really go hand in hand? It sounds a bit doubtful. Institutions are indeed stuck here, and Dusk's zero-knowledge KYC design is quite interesting. RWA implementation requires this kind of underlying support; otherwise, just talking about it in PPTs is useless.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureDeniedvip
· 9h ago
Can privacy and compliance coexist? Dusk's approach is indeed interesting; it seems zero-knowledge proofs are not just for show.
View OriginalReply0
On-ChainDivervip
· 9h ago
Can privacy compliance be handled together? Dusk's approach is indeed different.
View OriginalReply0
DecentralizedEldervip
· 9h ago
Can privacy and compliance be achieved simultaneously? This idea is truly brilliant; finally, someone has thought this through thoroughly.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinAnxietyvip
· 10h ago
Finally, someone has clarified the relationship between privacy and compliance, which have always been seen as mutually exclusive. This time, it's truly different. What institutions really need is this kind of approach—compliance doesn't mean full transparency, and privacy doesn't have to be rigidly against regulations. Keep an eye on the launch of DuskEVM. If it can genuinely make traditional finance folks comfortable with on-chain activities, then RWA (Real World Assets) will finally see hope.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeNightmarevip
· 10h ago
Hmm... Can privacy and compliance truly coexist? I need to dig deeper into this zero-knowledge proof; I'm afraid it might lead to another gas war.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)