RWA has been a topic for nearly two years, with capital interest growing, but few actual implementations. The core issue is straightforward: real-world assets require compliance, and compliance must protect privacy—how to balance these two?
Dusk Network's approach is quite interesting. They have integrated privacy computing and compliance auditing as native capabilities, allowing assets like stocks and bonds to be issued and transferred directly on-chain. The key is—sensitive data doesn't need to be fully exposed, satisfying the transparency needs of the blockchain while avoiding revealing all the underlying secrets. This solution truly addresses a pain point in the RWA scenario.
Another highlight is EVM compatibility. Existing applications can migrate with low costs, and developers don't need to start from scratch. Adding privacy features on top of compatibility creates a "plug-and-play" model that is particularly beneficial for ecosystem accumulation.
In the long run, the integration of traditional assets into blockchain is an inevitable trend, not just a fleeting hype. Those with the most robust underlying infrastructure and the best fit for compliance will reap the benefits. Dusk's clear and patient technical roadmap is positioning itself early for this wave. Compared to projects that only focus on short-term application hype, this strategic approach deserves more attention.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
blockBoy
· 7h ago
Privacy + compliance is indeed a tough combination, but Dusk's approach has some real potential.
Honestly, RWA has been hyped for so long, but few projects have actually landed. Balancing compliance and privacy has always been a bottleneck. Dusk makes both into core capabilities, which is an innovative perspective.
EVM compatibility is a key step. Developers are willing to get involved only if they don't have to reinvent the wheel, and only then can the ecosystem start to grow.
But it still depends on actual application implementation. No matter how good the technical solution is, if users don't adopt it, it's all for nothing. We'll have to wait and see if they can really bring assets like stocks and bonds onto the chain.
In the long run, on-chain assets will definitely be compliant, but how to get through the short-term challenges is still an open question.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagrant
· 23h ago
Compliance and privacy issues have indeed never been truly solved; Dusk's approach is considered to have grasped the key insight.
---
I give full marks for EVM compatibility. Developers inherently face zero barriers, which is the foundation for building a thriving ecosystem.
---
RWA has been hyped for too long. Now, the real winner will be those who can develop solid infrastructure.
---
Native integration of privacy computing and auditing is indeed a clever workaround, eliminating the need to choose one over the other.
---
Honestly, I'm just worried that later on it will be another PPT dream. It only counts if real applications are up and running.
---
This technical route is indeed more solid than those projects that chase quick gains. It's quite interesting.
---
A solid foundation is necessary to reap the benefits. There's no problem with this logic, but it also depends on how regulators perceive it.
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithNoFear
· 23h ago
Privacy and compliance are essentially a dance on the edge of a knife. Dusk's idea is indeed innovative.
EVM compatibility is really key; otherwise, it's hard for the ecosystem to take off.
RWA is a long-term trend, but 99% of the projects currently hyped are all talk. It depends on who can truly make the technology solid.
View OriginalReply0
MevSandwich
· 23h ago
Finally, someone is seriously working on this, not just blowing hot air. Privacy and compliance are inherently difficult issues, and Dusk's approach is indeed somewhat innovative.
I agree, those purely conceptual hype projects really need to clear the market.
EVM compatibility is a brilliant move; developers don't want to be forced to learn new languages.
If RWA really takes off, the underlying infrastructure will be the key, much more reliable than just application popularity.
Have they really been the only ones doing this for two years?
Privacy computing becoming a native capability is indeed a different approach. But compliance... local governments' views are still a problem.
It's somewhat interesting, but I'm worried it might just be another hype concept, and there will be no news in a couple of months.
EVM compatibility is really attractive; that's why this kind of solution can last longer.
Whether it can secure a position or not depends on whether it can truly capture user benefits.
Sensitive data isn't fully exposed, which is crucial for traditional financial institutions. The previous RWA project failed because of this.
View OriginalReply0
RektCoaster
· 23h ago
Alright, Dusk has finally identified the pain point—privacy and compliance are truly a tough challenge.
---
Another EVM-compatible project, this routine has been played out so many times. Only those who survive can speak.
---
Wait, how is on-chain transparency balanced with privacy data? What are the details?
---
RWA has been hyped for two years, but there hasn't been much real progress. Is this time reliable, or is it just another attempt to fleece investors?
---
With more players trying to stake their claim, how many will actually succeed? I think another batch will fail in this round.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSpy
· 23h ago
Listening to two years of hype, there are very few that truly materialize. This is the normal state of Web3.
The contradiction between RWA compliance and privacy indeed bottlenecks progress. Dusk's approach is quite promising.
EVM compatibility is the key; zero-cost migration for developers and ecosystem accumulation are essential.
Only with stable underlying infrastructure can we reap the benefits of asset on-chain.
Compared to those just hyping concepts, patient technical solutions like this are truly valuable.
View OriginalReply0
0xLuckbox
· 23h ago
Balancing these two is really difficult—one requires transparency, the other needs concealment. It feels like walking on a tightrope.
Integrating native privacy computing is indeed a fresh approach, but let's see when it can actually be used.
EVM compatibility makes things much more comfortable; developers won't have to struggle anymore.
RWA has been a topic for nearly two years, with capital interest growing, but few actual implementations. The core issue is straightforward: real-world assets require compliance, and compliance must protect privacy—how to balance these two?
Dusk Network's approach is quite interesting. They have integrated privacy computing and compliance auditing as native capabilities, allowing assets like stocks and bonds to be issued and transferred directly on-chain. The key is—sensitive data doesn't need to be fully exposed, satisfying the transparency needs of the blockchain while avoiding revealing all the underlying secrets. This solution truly addresses a pain point in the RWA scenario.
Another highlight is EVM compatibility. Existing applications can migrate with low costs, and developers don't need to start from scratch. Adding privacy features on top of compatibility creates a "plug-and-play" model that is particularly beneficial for ecosystem accumulation.
In the long run, the integration of traditional assets into blockchain is an inevitable trend, not just a fleeting hype. Those with the most robust underlying infrastructure and the best fit for compliance will reap the benefits. Dusk's clear and patient technical roadmap is positioning itself early for this wave. Compared to projects that only focus on short-term application hype, this strategic approach deserves more attention.