Today, the blockchain ecosystem faces an intriguing paradox: projects tout decentralization and freedom, yet are frequently hindered by compliance and privacy issues. Traditional financial institutions are especially cautious—some openly admit that the transparency and traceability of transactions make such chains unusable for them.
This is also why the emergence of Dusk is quite interesting. It didn't take the old route of bypassing regulation; instead, it integrated compliance mechanisms into the protocol layer. What's the difference? Most privacy solutions aim to make everything invisible, but what institutions truly need is "selective disclosure"—the ability to prove compliance to regulators when necessary without revealing all their secrets. Dusk's zero-knowledge proof circuits are specifically designed for this scenario: transactions enjoy privacy protection while still being able to provide compliance proof when needed. This essentially opens a window for traditional finance to get closer to blockchain.
Looking at its tech stack, Dusk's SBA consensus mechanism is actually underestimated by many. It doesn't blindly chase TPS numbers but combines transaction finality and privacy computation at the core layer. In other words, DeFi or asset tokenization applications running on it have native privacy features, not just patches added later. Users who have experienced the testnet can feel the seamless blend of speed and confidentiality—that's the kind of experience a financial-grade blockchain should deliver.
From an ecosystem perspective, Dusk hasn't taken the usual approach of spreading out widely but has focused on refining the details.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCrybaby
· 9h ago
Basically, it's just wanting to have the best of both worlds—privacy and compliance—how can they possibly be perfectly achieved together?
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxAddict
· 9h ago
Well said, the idea of selective disclosure is indeed brilliant. You don't have to go completely naked or fully hide, it's clever.
View OriginalReply0
TeaTimeTrader
· 9h ago
The idea of selective disclosure is truly brilliant. Finally, a project has understood the real pain points of traditional finance.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropSweaterFan
· 9h ago
The idea of selective disclosure is brilliant; finally, someone has identified the real pain points of traditional finance.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedTwice
· 9h ago
It's that kind of "We want decentralization and compliance" sweet dream again... It sounds nice, but in practice, it's all compromises.
Dusk's selective disclosure approach is indeed interesting, but isn't that just saying "We help you pretend to be compliant"?
Writing compliance mechanisms at the protocol layer? It sounds like using technical means to do regulatory work—are we truly free?
Having both privacy and high TPS? I've heard that too many times. Let's wait until it actually goes live on the mainnet before bragging.
But I have to admit, at least daring to confront this issue head-on is more honest than most projects playing tricks.
Today, the blockchain ecosystem faces an intriguing paradox: projects tout decentralization and freedom, yet are frequently hindered by compliance and privacy issues. Traditional financial institutions are especially cautious—some openly admit that the transparency and traceability of transactions make such chains unusable for them.
This is also why the emergence of Dusk is quite interesting. It didn't take the old route of bypassing regulation; instead, it integrated compliance mechanisms into the protocol layer. What's the difference? Most privacy solutions aim to make everything invisible, but what institutions truly need is "selective disclosure"—the ability to prove compliance to regulators when necessary without revealing all their secrets. Dusk's zero-knowledge proof circuits are specifically designed for this scenario: transactions enjoy privacy protection while still being able to provide compliance proof when needed. This essentially opens a window for traditional finance to get closer to blockchain.
Looking at its tech stack, Dusk's SBA consensus mechanism is actually underestimated by many. It doesn't blindly chase TPS numbers but combines transaction finality and privacy computation at the core layer. In other words, DeFi or asset tokenization applications running on it have native privacy features, not just patches added later. Users who have experienced the testnet can feel the seamless blend of speed and confidentiality—that's the kind of experience a financial-grade blockchain should deliver.
From an ecosystem perspective, Dusk hasn't taken the usual approach of spreading out widely but has focused on refining the details.