Behind the booming RWA (Real Asset Chain Reform), there lies a common industry problem: most projects only leave superficial compliance data traces, lacking end-to-end traceability capabilities. Once disputes arise over ownership, transactions, or other links, institutions and regulators often find themselves on the passive side—unable to accurately trace what happened at each node, with high verification costs and an unstable trust foundation.



This is also why Dusk Network has been deeply engaged in the Layer1 track since 2018, focusing its core efforts on building a complete compliance data traceability closed loop. The key to this system is: making every piece of compliance data on the chain traceable, verifiable, and provable, forming an immutable complete evidence chain from source to endpoint.

Technically, Dusk Network uses the PLONK-based zero-knowledge proof algorithm to generate a unique traceability identifier for each piece of compliance data. From asset initialization on the chain, transaction flow, to compliance reporting, each operation becomes an information node, supporting reverse layer-by-layer verification. Coupled with a modular architecture and dedicated traceability management modules, it can interface with multiple system endpoints, automatically synchronizing data sources and flow trajectories. Such a design naturally aligns with emerging regulations like MiCA, which impose strict requirements on data traceability.

This value has been validated in real projects. When serving a securities tokenization project exceeding €200 million, a ownership registration dispute occurred. Using the traceability closed loop, the project team quickly traced the entire chain from issuance registration, transaction transfer, to ownership change. Every node’s information was clearly visible, and the dispute source was pinpointed within hours—something that would normally take days of manual verification—providing regulators with irrefutable, comprehensive evidence.

Solving the "difficult verification of disputes" problem hinges on shifting from passive remediation to proactive design. Dusk Network breaks free from the limitations of "single trace" thinking, enabling compliance data to form a complete evidence chain closed loop. This is not only a technological innovation but also establishes a trust anchor for the RWA ecosystem, allowing institutions and regulators to find certainty within a clear data chain, and pushing the entire industry’s compliance system toward a more refined and transparent stage.
DUSK-22,68%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TommyTeacher1vip
· 01-21 18:51
Honestly, the waters of RWA are quite deep. No matter how beautiful the surface articles are, they are of no use. The compliance traceability logic indeed hits the pain points, but how many projects are truly implemented? PLONK zero-knowledge proof sounds good, but can the costs be controlled? Dusk's 200 million euro case looks quite impressive, but no one knows what happened afterward. Speaking of which, after MiCA arrives, these types of schemes really need to be taken seriously. It still feels like gilding compliance; true trust depends on the system.
View OriginalReply0
SelfSovereignStevevip
· 01-21 18:51
To be honest, most of the current RWA projects are just superficial articles, with poor traceability capabilities that leave people speechless. Getting disputes resolved in a few hours? That kind of efficiency really gives traditional finance a run for its money. But that set of zero-knowledge proofs... frankly, it's a bit complicated. Can ordinary users really understand it? Dusk's approach is quite interesting—treat compliance as a product. No wonder they've raised so much money. Speaking of that 200 million euro project, if it could truly be fully transparent, regulators would be happy, and I’d be happy too. Making money without breaking the law is the most comfortable. With such strict MiCA requirements, projects in Europe are really getting stuck. A closed-loop traceability system sounds good, but can it withstand hacker attacks? What do they say about this? If Web3 can really give traditional assets an "ID card," that would be revolutionary. PLONK proof algorithms... another bunch of cryptography. As long as you trust it, that’s enough. RWA is booming, no doubt, but honestly, the projects that are truly usable are few and far between.
View OriginalReply0
UncleWhalevip
· 01-21 18:44
This is a genuinely working project, unlike those that just talk big all day long.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenDAOvip
· 01-21 18:32
Traceability closed-loop sounds very appealing, but the problem is—who will ensure that this system itself won't become the next centralized trap? Data traceability = trust, this logic has flaws.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)