What is the core competitive advantage of privacy public chains in enterprise-level applications? To put it simply, it's two words: trust.
From a technical perspective, DUSK performs well in this regard. Sensitive data privacy protection and the reliability of smart contract execution are the pain points that enterprises care about most. Enterprise users are not here to play with concepts; they want real security and compliance guarantees.
The team is also pragmatic, focusing on technological innovation and practical ecosystem applications rather than constantly hyping valuation or storytelling. This level of focus is even more valuable in the current market environment.
DUSK's long-term potential lies in the fact that when enterprises truly need on-chain solutions, privacy and security are no longer optional but essential requirements. Whoever can develop usable solutions in this track will have the opportunity.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SnapshotDayLaborer
· 20h ago
That's true, but I just want to ask... how many companies are truly willing to pay now?
View OriginalReply0
PumpDoctrine
· 01-21 17:52
Enterprise-level means being practical; storytelling doesn't work for B2B. It depends on whether the tech stack can hold up. DUSK's approach is correct.
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressHunter
· 01-21 17:50
Exactly right, enterprise-level should be about solid, tangible things, not just superficial conceptual hype.
Projects like DUSK, which focus on technology quietly, are actually more reliable. Privacy compliance is indeed a real necessity, not just a gimmick.
I'm just worried it might be another good project without proper market operation...
View OriginalReply0
hodl_therapist
· 01-21 17:45
That's a good point. The DUSK logic indeed hits the real needs of enterprises. However, to be honest, I'm more concerned about whether it can truly be implemented.
I've seen too many projects promising "hard needs" before, but they all ended up abandoned.
That said, privacy + security is definitely the inevitable trend in the next wave, but competitors are also intensifying the competition. It all depends on who can survive until that day.
As long as we stay calm and focus on solid technology, it's definitely worth paying attention to.
View OriginalReply0
AirDropMissed
· 01-21 17:40
The enterprise level truly values tangible results, and a team that doesn't boast is actually rare. The approach of DUSK is on the right track.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropNinja
· 01-21 17:33
This is a serious team that gets things done, unlike some projects that boast every day.
View OriginalReply0
TheShibaWhisperer
· 01-21 17:30
Trust is really hard to sell, but it must be usable. DUSK focuses on practical results, unlike some projects that just boast all day long.
What is the core competitive advantage of privacy public chains in enterprise-level applications? To put it simply, it's two words: trust.
From a technical perspective, DUSK performs well in this regard. Sensitive data privacy protection and the reliability of smart contract execution are the pain points that enterprises care about most. Enterprise users are not here to play with concepts; they want real security and compliance guarantees.
The team is also pragmatic, focusing on technological innovation and practical ecosystem applications rather than constantly hyping valuation or storytelling. This level of focus is even more valuable in the current market environment.
DUSK's long-term potential lies in the fact that when enterprises truly need on-chain solutions, privacy and security are no longer optional but essential requirements. Whoever can develop usable solutions in this track will have the opportunity.