Cryptocurrency market volatility is well known—everyone enjoys the bull market, but the bear market leaves everything in disarray. For most DeFi protocols, this cycle is like a stamina-draining race: when token prices drop, TVL declines, yields decrease, users disperse, creating a vicious cycle. But interestingly, when you introduce stablecoins into this ecosystem, the story becomes more complex.



Taking USD1 and the lista ecosystem as an example, this symbiotic relationship is actually a natural shock absorption system. Imagine days of market plummeting—ETH halved, a bunch of protocols relying solely on token incentives see their TVL evaporate, and users panic sell.

But on the lista side, a relatively stable factor comes into play: USD1 is always pegged to 1 USD. No matter how ETH drops, this stability remains. The key is, the bear market is precisely when demand for stablecoins is at its peak—people are eager to find a safe haven.

This is where the cleverness comes in. When users want to convert risky assets, there are actually two options: one is to sell ETH directly on exchanges for USDC or other stablecoins to clear their positions; the other is to deposit ETH into lista as collateral and borrow out USD1 stablecoins. The latter has a clever advantage—it locks in the safety of stablecoins while still preserving the upside potential of ETH, avoiding forced liquidation.

Once this mechanism is operational, the TVL of the lista protocol gains natural protection. During a bear market, it not only avoids falling into a death spiral but can also attract smart capital that wants to hedge risks without completely abandoning yields. This is the true power of the stablecoin + collateral protocol combination.
USD1-0,05%
LISTA-6,61%
ETH-5,13%
USDC-0,03%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Blockwatcher9000vip
· 01-21 23:35
Sounds good, but the problem is that most people just cut their positions recklessly in a bear market. How many "smart funds" would really operate meticulously?
View OriginalReply0
CryingOldWalletvip
· 01-21 17:48
This logic is indeed brilliant, essentially leaving yourself a backup plan so you don't have to cut losses.
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfastvip
· 01-21 17:48
During a bear market bottom, the Lista strategy is indeed excellent—it's both stable and opportunistic. That's the true choice of smart money.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedAgainvip
· 01-21 17:45
It sounds like a good idea, but I still remember the lesson from the last liquidation event... No matter how beautifully the collateralization ratio is designed, a black swan event can still trigger forced liquidation. Bull market demand does not mean the protocol is safe; the key is whether the liquidation price can hold. Let's see what happens if USD1 becomes unpegged once. A safe haven on paper sounds great, but in practice, you still need to watch the borrowing rate and collateralization ratio. If only we knew earlier. Once again, being attracted by this kind of "smart money," many end up replenishing their positions until they run out of funds. As for pegging stablecoins to 1 USD... do you dare to go all in? I don't dare; I learned the hard way that it can lead to huge losses. It seems like mutualism, but in reality, it's just a different liquidation method. One wrong move in risk control can make TVL protection meaningless. It's a rather idealistic analysis, but DeFi is like that—there's no absolute anti-shock system, only relatively slower liquidations.
View OriginalReply0
BlockDetectivevip
· 01-21 17:40
This logic is indeed solid; using stablecoins as a hedging tool is much better than selling them directly.
View OriginalReply0
BankruptWorkervip
· 01-21 17:39
This logic sounds good, but who cares about these when the real bear market arrives? --- Can USD1 stay stable? Wait for another round of cleansing in the crypto world to find out --- Not cutting losses to preserve returns—where in the world is there such a good thing? --- I've heard this set of arguments from lista too many times; in the end, it's still about attracting new users --- Stablecoins pegged to the US dollar are indeed stable, but the real question is whether they are stable or not depends entirely on the exchange's depth --- It sounds like a story, but I want to see real TVL data --- Symbiotic relationship? Haha, it feels more like mutual bloodsucking --- The bear market is really coming; how long can this design hold up?
View OriginalReply0
BottomMisservip
· 01-21 17:31
Sounds good, but the problem is how many people can really withstand the bear market without selling in a panic? Even if you promised not to sell, aren't you still panicking in the end?
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyIssuesvip
· 01-21 17:24
It sounds reasonable, but the problem is that most people can't wait for the "smart money" phase and have already been scared away. The demand for stablecoins is strong during a bear market, but what if Lista's own coin crashes? History has proven this too many times. The USD1 peg seems stable, but in reality, it's just a gamble on whether its reserves are really there. Want to keep the upside potential of ETH? Sounds good, but the USD1 borrowed still needs to be repaid, and there are a bunch of fees. It still feels like storytelling; in reality, during a big drop, no one cares about mechanism design, they just want to exit quickly.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)