The recent remarks by Fabio Panetta, Governor of the Bank of Italy, have sparked some thoughts: commercial bank money and central bank money still form the foundation of the monetary system, but does this logic seem a bit outdated? However, from the central bank's perspective, their concerns are not unfounded—stablecoins heavily rely on pegging to fiat currencies, which directly limits their independence.
What is more worth paying attention to is the competitive landscape in the payments sector. Panetta believes that payments have become a core strategic battleground for banks, and the impact of digital finance is indeed increasing pressure. Geopolitical polarization and the transfer of technological power are all driving changes in the financial landscape.
The stance of the Bank of Italy is quite cautious. The deputy governor bluntly stated: a multi-issuer stablecoin model could pose legal, operational, and financial stability risks to the EU, and must be limited to regions with the same regulatory standards, along with strict reserve requirements. This is a typical central bank mindset—control first, then observe.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SnapshotBot
· 21h ago
The central bank is still playing the "control first, then see" game. Is that how stablecoins are being suffocated?
Basically, they're afraid of losing control, but crypto has indeed changed something.
Are multi-issuer stablecoins really that scary, or are they simply protecting their own interests?
The payment war has already begun, yet they still want to block it with old methods.
View OriginalReply0
MetaNeighbor
· 21h ago
The central bank is still clinging to the fiat currency system. Wake up, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBroke
· 21h ago
The central bank is still fooling itself. What's the use of so many restrictions on stablecoins? The technological power has already shifted away.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBrokenPromise
· 21h ago
The central bank is still sticking to the old ways. Do they really think pegging fiat currency can keep stablecoins stable forever? Wake up.
View OriginalReply0
ruggedNotShrugged
· 21h ago
I'm tired of the central bank's rhetoric. Stablecoins are just a threat to their cheese, don't pretend.
View OriginalReply0
PebbleHander
· 21h ago
The central bank is still clinging to the fiat currency system. It's about time to wake up.
The recent remarks by Fabio Panetta, Governor of the Bank of Italy, have sparked some thoughts: commercial bank money and central bank money still form the foundation of the monetary system, but does this logic seem a bit outdated? However, from the central bank's perspective, their concerns are not unfounded—stablecoins heavily rely on pegging to fiat currencies, which directly limits their independence.
What is more worth paying attention to is the competitive landscape in the payments sector. Panetta believes that payments have become a core strategic battleground for banks, and the impact of digital finance is indeed increasing pressure. Geopolitical polarization and the transfer of technological power are all driving changes in the financial landscape.
The stance of the Bank of Italy is quite cautious. The deputy governor bluntly stated: a multi-issuer stablecoin model could pose legal, operational, and financial stability risks to the EU, and must be limited to regions with the same regulatory standards, along with strict reserve requirements. This is a typical central bank mindset—control first, then observe.