Storage costs have always been a longstanding issue. Whether it's precious personal files or core assets of enterprises, ensuring data security and reliability often means paying several times more on the bill. Recently, I came across the Walrus protocol, which is considered to break this deadlock.
First, let's talk about how it achieves this. It uses an efficient coding technology at the core, which sounds abstract but is actually a mathematical method that allows a small number of backups to guarantee data integrity—this directly reduces costs to just one percent of traditional solutions. This is not an exaggeration; these are real figures.
For enterprises, what does this mean? Critical product designs, customer information, financial reports—storing them no longer requires worrying about high bills. Moreover, data is dispersed across nodes worldwide, with no single point of failure, greatly reducing risk.
But I think the more ingenious part is its programmability. Data stored within can be directly read and managed by smart contracts, enabling developers to create many innovative applications with this capability. In the past, data layer bottlenecks always hampered decentralized applications, but now, with this support, the possibilities are suddenly expanded.
The team behind the project has a good reputation in the industry, plus strategic investments from leading institutions, providing real support for ecosystem development. You can clearly feel that more and more developers are starting to build applications based on this protocol. Feedback during the testnet phase has been quite positive, and the genuine growth momentum is visible.
In terms of security, it relies on a combination of mathematics and distributed networks. Your data is permanently encoded on the chain, making tampering virtually impossible. Users can truly have autonomous control over their digital assets and memories for the first time, no longer at the mercy of centralized platforms.
Honestly, my reason for being optimistic about this project is simple: it uses reliable technological innovation to directly target the most painful pain points in the storage field, and has already built a relatively complete ecosystem around this core. Such projects are worth long-term observation.
After the mainnet launches, it is expected to attract more users and creative ideas. A more efficient and open digital infrastructure might just be established this way.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MidnightSeller
· 01-14 00:05
One percent of the cost? That number sounds a bit outrageous. We’ll have to wait until the mainnet is truly up and running to believe it.
---
Distributed storage has been hyped for years; now we just need to see if Walrus can actually be implemented.
---
Programmable storage is indeed interesting. The data layer of DApps finally doesn’t have to be so constrained.
---
The team has a good reputation, funding is in place, but it all depends on whether the actual user base grows.
---
The most feared thing in crypto is this kind of aggressive promise. Saying "one percent of the cost" is easy to talk about.
---
I still have doubts about smart contracts directly reading data. Can the security risks really be completely avoided?
---
It’s easy to say before the mainnet launches, but the real test is after. I’m optimistic, but I wouldn’t invest recklessly.
---
Spreading distributed nodes worldwide sounds great, but who will bear the actual operational costs?
---
Permanent data encoding sounds secure, but what if a node encounters a problem? How exactly would recovery work?
---
Honestly, I encounter several projects like this every year, promoting low cost and high security. And in the end?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6bc33122
· 01-12 18:53
1% of the cost, that number sounds really extreme, but it needs time to verify.
Can the contract read data directly? If that can be truly utilized well, DeFi could indeed come up with new innovations.
The team has a good background, but the key is whether the ecosystem can really take off after the mainnet launches. It's still too early to say anything now.
The storage cost has been reduced so much, centralized players must be getting anxious.
I actually agree with the idea of data being scattered across global nodes; single point failure is definitely something to pay attention to.
Wait, does such low cost mean that security might be compromised? Anyway, I want to see more real feedback from the testnet before making a decision.
Honestly, I’m a bit interested in trying it out, but I won’t go all in. Risks and opportunities in projects like this often come hand in hand.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryBaby
· 01-12 18:38
Cut costs to 1%? That's so exaggerated. Will the actual implementation be another story?
---
Wait, smart contracts directly read stored data... I haven't seen many protocols do this well.
---
The team has a good reputation, but no matter how aggressively they promote before the mainnet launch, it still depends on the data once it's live.
---
Another distributed storage project—how long will it take to innovate enough?
---
A 1% cost? I feel like I just heard a story... Will prices go up again when user scale really picks up?
---
I hadn't thought about programmable storage from this perspective; it's quite interesting.
---
Another project claiming to "break the deadlock"—let's wait until the mainnet actually launches.
---
The ecosystem development seems complete, but whether developers will really migrate over is still uncertain.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekConfession
· 01-12 18:32
One percent of the cost? That number sounds a bit vague; it depends on how it performs in practice.
We need to keep a close eye after the mainnet launches. If this coding scheme really gets implemented, the storage aspect definitely needs a reshuffle.
I've been exploited by billing schemes before, but now someone is finally serious.
I'm a bit interested in programmable storage; smart contracts can directly read... Developers can really create something.
But as always, we have to wait until the data is truly on-chain and running for a while. The beauty on paper ultimately depends on execution.
View OriginalReply0
UnruggableChad
· 01-12 18:27
One percent of the cost? That number sounds too good to be true; we need to see real projects in action to know for sure.
Regarding the mainnet launch, it's likely to be hyped up by various expectations, but reality might be more sobering.
Programmable storage is indeed interesting, but I'm worried it might end up being a situation where dapp developers are not on board.
Storage costs have always been a longstanding issue. Whether it's precious personal files or core assets of enterprises, ensuring data security and reliability often means paying several times more on the bill. Recently, I came across the Walrus protocol, which is considered to break this deadlock.
First, let's talk about how it achieves this. It uses an efficient coding technology at the core, which sounds abstract but is actually a mathematical method that allows a small number of backups to guarantee data integrity—this directly reduces costs to just one percent of traditional solutions. This is not an exaggeration; these are real figures.
For enterprises, what does this mean? Critical product designs, customer information, financial reports—storing them no longer requires worrying about high bills. Moreover, data is dispersed across nodes worldwide, with no single point of failure, greatly reducing risk.
But I think the more ingenious part is its programmability. Data stored within can be directly read and managed by smart contracts, enabling developers to create many innovative applications with this capability. In the past, data layer bottlenecks always hampered decentralized applications, but now, with this support, the possibilities are suddenly expanded.
The team behind the project has a good reputation in the industry, plus strategic investments from leading institutions, providing real support for ecosystem development. You can clearly feel that more and more developers are starting to build applications based on this protocol. Feedback during the testnet phase has been quite positive, and the genuine growth momentum is visible.
In terms of security, it relies on a combination of mathematics and distributed networks. Your data is permanently encoded on the chain, making tampering virtually impossible. Users can truly have autonomous control over their digital assets and memories for the first time, no longer at the mercy of centralized platforms.
Honestly, my reason for being optimistic about this project is simple: it uses reliable technological innovation to directly target the most painful pain points in the storage field, and has already built a relatively complete ecosystem around this core. Such projects are worth long-term observation.
After the mainnet launches, it is expected to attract more users and creative ideas. A more efficient and open digital infrastructure might just be established this way.