2026-01-10 09:33:10

Alon Cohen, the founder of Pumpfun, recently revealed that the platform is optimizing its fee structure. He pointed out that the current fee model has certain issues—making it easy to distort incentive mechanisms and hindering the healthy development of the ecosystem.

To address this problem, Pumpfun plans to introduce a new "Creator Fee Sharing" system. The core idea of this new mechanism is straightforward: after the token is officially launched, creators and CTO (Community Takeover) administrators can flexibly allocate the collected fees to up to 10 designated beneficiaries in specific proportions.

The significance of this design is that it makes fee flows more transparent and controllable. Creators are no longer forced to accept a single fee structure but can adjust the distribution plan based on their community situation and partnerships. For creators who have established core operational teams or important partners, this means they can share platform revenue more fairly.

This change also reflects Pumpfun's consideration of how to balance platform interests, creator benefits, and community governance. By giving creators more autonomy, the platform aims to encourage more high-quality creators to participate while strengthening a community-driven development model.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropHarvester

· 01-12 15:10

Finally, someone dares to touch the cake of fees, but... can this dividend system really prevent large investors from transferring value among themselves?

View OriginalReply0

DaisyUnicorn

· 01-12 05:43

Oh wow, so under the guise of "giving creators autonomy," they've secretly handed the distribution rights back to the platform... But on the other hand, setting the limit of 10 beneficiaries is quite considerate, preventing someone from creating a "fee black hole."

View OriginalReply0

NotSatoshi

· 01-10 10:02

Hmm... Once again, fee reform. Can we really split the cake better this time? It was about time to do this. The previous fee model was indeed a bit harsh. Basically, it's about giving creators more power to decide how to split earnings. I agree with this logic. The cap of ten beneficiaries is a bit low, but it's definitely better than before. If this can be truly implemented, it might be the kind of model Pumpfun is aiming for. The key is how it will be carried out in the future; just shouting slogans won't help. Sounds good, but I wonder if creators will be secretly manipulated by the platform again. The sharing mechanism is more transparent, at least on paper, it doesn't look too shady. Still feel like something is missing... but this direction is definitely right.

View OriginalReply0

MEVSandwich

· 01-10 09:54

It's finally happening. The fee distribution should have been changed a long time ago.

View OriginalReply0

ReverseFOMOguy

· 01-10 09:49

Starting to play with the fee distribution again. To put it simply, it's still about adjusting the profit-sharing structure.

View OriginalReply0

HashRatePhilosopher

· 01-10 09:42

Another fee structure, has Pumpfun really thought it through? To put it nicely, it's transparent; to be blunt, it's just afraid of creators running away. Wait, allocated to 10 beneficiaries? Isn't that just a disguised way of cutting the leeks haha. It feels like patching holes, but the fundamental problem hasn't been solved. Creators have more autonomy, but platform profits are less. Is this deal worth it? Honestly, these platforms are all playing the same tricks. How long have they been talking about fee transparency? Just want to see how many creators can actually make money with this system.

View OriginalReply0