Britain's counter-terrorism watchdog is advocating for stricter age-gating measures on social media, drawing inspiration from Australia's recent approach. The proposal centers on banning users under 16 from accessing major platforms, mirroring Australia's controversial legislation.
This push reflects growing concerns about radicalization, mental health impacts, and online safety for minors. While the UK terror agency frames it through a security lens, the broader debate touches on platform responsibility, parental control mechanisms, and the role of age verification technology.
For the crypto and Web3 space, this signals potential future compliance requirements. Exchanges and DeFi platforms already grapple with KYC/AML regulations; stricter age verification could become another layer of mandatory compliance. The conversation raises questions: How would platforms implement robust age-checking? Would blockchain-based identity solutions offer a path forward? And what's the balance between protecting minors and respecting digital privacy?
Australia's model, though not without critics, shows governments are willing to act. Whether other jurisdictions follow remains to be seen, but expect regulatory pressure to mount across markets.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
governance_ghost
· 01-06 20:21
ngl, this age verification has truly become the next nightmare for crypto exchanges... Isn't KYC harsh enough?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-bd883c58
· 01-06 13:24
ngl This is just another excuse the government wants to regulate... Disable under 16? Wake up, kids have been using it for a long time. The key issue is that KYC is becoming more and more extreme. Do we really need to add another layer of identity verification for crypto? So annoying.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTherapist
· 01-05 19:29
NGL, here we go again. The government is trying to crack down on our Web3 identity verification system... KYC isn't enough, now they want to verify age too? LOL, can anyone under 16 really be stopped from being a kid?
View OriginalReply0
SerumSquirter
· 01-05 17:28
NGL, it's the same old trick again. The government insists on regulating young people's internet usage... Blockchain authentication sounds good, but how does it actually get implemented?
View OriginalReply0
GasWhisperer
· 01-03 21:22
ngl, if they're gonna force age verification on everything, the mempool's about to get absolutely congested with identity transactions... who's calculating those gas waves? 🤔 blockchain identity could work but the fee overhead alone would tank adoption rates, fr fr
Reply0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
· 01-03 21:21
Here we go again, governments are thinking about how to regulate us... Banning under 16? Are they trying to make young people miss the best opportunity to build on-chain identities?
View OriginalReply0
airdrop_whisperer
· 01-03 21:21
NGL, here comes the regulation again, banning those under 16... Now on-chain identity verification is about to take off. Let's see who can come up with the most seamless solution.
View OriginalReply0
4am_degen
· 01-03 21:16
NGL, this is just the government messing around again... Banning under 16? Those kids have already bypassed the firewall long ago, alright.
KYC is already annoying enough, now they want to add age verification. Exchanges will be regulated to death sooner or later.
Blockchain identity solutions sound good, but people simply won't use them. Traditional methods are still necessary.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyLemur
· 01-03 21:00
ngl Another wave of regulatory crackdown... But can the 16-year-old age restriction really stop kids who want to go online? LOL
Britain's counter-terrorism watchdog is advocating for stricter age-gating measures on social media, drawing inspiration from Australia's recent approach. The proposal centers on banning users under 16 from accessing major platforms, mirroring Australia's controversial legislation.
This push reflects growing concerns about radicalization, mental health impacts, and online safety for minors. While the UK terror agency frames it through a security lens, the broader debate touches on platform responsibility, parental control mechanisms, and the role of age verification technology.
For the crypto and Web3 space, this signals potential future compliance requirements. Exchanges and DeFi platforms already grapple with KYC/AML regulations; stricter age verification could become another layer of mandatory compliance. The conversation raises questions: How would platforms implement robust age-checking? Would blockchain-based identity solutions offer a path forward? And what's the balance between protecting minors and respecting digital privacy?
Australia's model, though not without critics, shows governments are willing to act. Whether other jurisdictions follow remains to be seen, but expect regulatory pressure to mount across markets.