Let's face it—the bottleneck isn't capital. We've got money pouring in from everywhere. The real problem? There simply aren't enough quality projects out there. Most of what's trading is... well, let's call it 'suboptimal.' We're drowning in mediocre tokens while genuine innovation stays scarce. Shouldn't this be obvious to everyone by now? Why isn't this the conversation we're having?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RadioShackKnight
· 5h ago
The price of compromise is watching trash coins fill the sky.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmes
· 5h ago
Fine, but this logic is reversed. The more trash projects there are, the more it indicates that the funding threshold is too low.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologist
· 5h ago
Really? Isn't capital the bottleneck? I feel like good projects are hard to find in the first place, and having more money just leads to reckless investing...
Let's face it—the bottleneck isn't capital. We've got money pouring in from everywhere. The real problem? There simply aren't enough quality projects out there. Most of what's trading is... well, let's call it 'suboptimal.' We're drowning in mediocre tokens while genuine innovation stays scarce. Shouldn't this be obvious to everyone by now? Why isn't this the conversation we're having?