Most perpetual contract platforms have terribly designed trading interfaces—just try out the new generation of trading products to see. They treat trading like a gambling game—public market liquidity is the "casino table," and your private execution panel is the "hand of cards." This sense of disconnection is already uncomfortable enough. Some of the latest platforms are beginning to reflect on this issue; they are no longer solely focused on stacking features but are genuinely starting from the psychological needs of traders. Interface logic, information presentation, execution feedback—every detail asks a question: does this design make traders' decision-making clearer? This human-centered product approach might be what a perpetual trading platform should truly look like.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CoffeeNFTradervip
· 12h ago
To be honest, I'm already tired of the UI of those old platforms; it's really a mess. The new products are much more comfortable, finally someone is treating traders like humans. Wait, can this "user-centered" approach really help us make money? No matter how beautiful the interface is, trading still depends on oneself. Perpetuals are essentially gambling, right? UI optimization is just a superficial fix.
View OriginalReply0
DaoResearchervip
· 12h ago
According to the white paper data, the information architecture defect rate for perpetual contract UX design is as high as 73%, and this view is confirmed. Governance proposals indicate that incompatible incentives are the root cause—dispersed traders are fundamentally unable to form collective decision-making constraints. Speaking of which, from a Tokenomics perspective, such platforms need to introduce a Tokenomics feedback loop to involve users in governance design itself, otherwise it's pointless. Quoting Vitalik's view: Product democratization > feature stacking, now that's real insight.
View OriginalReply0
Fren_Not_Foodvip
· 12h ago
To be honest, those previous platforms were really outrageous, with interfaces as chaotic as a vegetable market.
View OriginalReply0
TideRecedervip
· 12h ago
Someone finally said it: those old platforms are truly the ceiling of garbage UI.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt