From a financial and governance perspective, the fundamentals are fine, and proposal votes are proceeding normally. So what is the reason for the lack of a sharp surge? To put it simply, it’s about making way for the bearish forces—there are both retail investors and quite a few institutions involved.
Honestly, in the holding structure of these tokens, large holders account for a significant proportion, so the market cap is limited. LPs could theoretically move to other DEXs, but what about the reality? The performance differences among the top players in the entire DeFi industry are only about 10 percentage points. Looking for alternatives further down the line, security starts to drop significantly. Under these circumstances, the probability that they will move is actually quite low.
More importantly, institutions have very high requirements for liquidity depth—this directly limits their options. Plus, this direction was chosen by the voting community itself; people tend to follow the crowd. Once a decision is made, the motivation to exit is not that strong. The churn rate may even decrease further, forming a certain balance.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoCrazyGF
· 5h ago
If the fundamentals are fine and it still doesn't rise, then it's just the big players suppressing it. Retail investors and institutions are just watching the show.
View OriginalReply0
RektButStillHere
· 6h ago
That's right, it's just the old trick of big players controlling the market and retail investors taking the fall.
View OriginalReply0
AmateurDAOWatcher
· 6h ago
If the fundamentals are fine but it still doesn't go up, I'm tired of hearing that logic... Basically, it just means no one is buying.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSurfer
· 6h ago
The market is too small, with a bunch of big players, liquidity depth is frozen, and you can't even run away. This is the current situation.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSpy
· 6h ago
The fundamentals are fine, yet it doesn't go up—that logic is really solid. To put it simply, it's just locked.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-cff9c776
· 6h ago
Basically, it's just being locked up. Large holders hold the keys, LPs can't run, institutions can't run either. This is the perfect illustration of the so-called "liquidity trap."
From a financial and governance perspective, the fundamentals are fine, and proposal votes are proceeding normally. So what is the reason for the lack of a sharp surge? To put it simply, it’s about making way for the bearish forces—there are both retail investors and quite a few institutions involved.
Honestly, in the holding structure of these tokens, large holders account for a significant proportion, so the market cap is limited. LPs could theoretically move to other DEXs, but what about the reality? The performance differences among the top players in the entire DeFi industry are only about 10 percentage points. Looking for alternatives further down the line, security starts to drop significantly. Under these circumstances, the probability that they will move is actually quite low.
More importantly, institutions have very high requirements for liquidity depth—this directly limits their options. Plus, this direction was chosen by the voting community itself; people tend to follow the crowd. Once a decision is made, the motivation to exit is not that strong. The churn rate may even decrease further, forming a certain balance.