Can Bitcoin stabilize between 180,000 and 240,000 in Q1? There's a deeper logic behind this question.
You’ll understand instantly when comparing the growth rates of traditional assets. Gold took half a year to rise 50%, silver a month for 50%, platinum a week for 50%, palladium three days for 50%, and even tin by the roadside can surge 50% in a day. So what about cryptocurrencies? This is an incremental market, and everyone has an answer in their heart.
How did the textbook cases of the first two bull markets unfold? The performance of coins like MASK, DYDX, YGG, ICP says it all. Take MASK as an example: it opened at 0.5U and soared to 75U within a few hours that night. This is not a story of "slow growth," but a script of "all in one day."
How many people in the crypto world haven't gone crazy? The only difference is early madness versus late madness. Early mad people accumulate chips at the bottom, late mad people buy at the top. Those who are now losing more than ten times, the core issue is actually very simple: being sober at the wrong time, and crazy at the wrong time. Calm down early at the top, how could you lose like this? But human nature always works against it—that's the cruel truth.
During Ethereum's rise from a few thousand to 10,000, retail investors generally looked at 20,000. What are 90% of KOLs doing now? Recommissions, collecting tuition fees, selling emotions, selling certainty. Their underlying logic is just one sentence: they don't need you to survive long-term, only to trade frequently. So they must shout fast, shout fierce, shout certainty, create FOMO, and keep you moving.
The full network liquidation on October 11 was not an accident; disasters always strike those who are unprepared. Someone warned as early as July not to use leverage. The first wave of retail liquidation was direct zeroing, the second wave was only after the main rally. Opportunities are only for those who are prepared.
The market layering logic is very clear: Bitcoin determines whether you survive, Ethereum determines whether you are stable, and only altcoins can truly turn things around. Two years ago, when the whole network was bearish on Bitcoin, it was a bottoming process; at the end of June, when the whole network was calling Ethereum trash, it was still bottoming. Now, altcoins are being mocked and denied by the whole network, but they are doing the same thing.
Other KOLs' routines are always opposite: at the bottom, they let you cut; at the halfway point, they let you rush; the only goal is—making you unable to survive, unsteady, and unable to turn things around.
What has a three-year cycle proven? Others always say, "The market didn't die, I died." Those who follow the trend not only caught the big waves of Bitcoin and Ethereum but also became the main force that cannot be washed out no matter how the market manipulates. The main force fears not those star players, but the longevity of persistent players. This is what institutions do, and what the true market winners do.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RektRecorder
· 4h ago
Another article titled "I Understand Market Psychology," haha
---
What you said is not wrong, but also not entirely right; the key is still the timing issue
---
Bottom-fishing and top-fishing require a different mindset, and the difference can be tenfold in returns
---
That KOL rebate logic is indeed disgusting, but retail investors also need to use their brains
---
The MASK wave was indeed crazy, but are there still coins like that now?
---
Early madness and late madness—this analogy is perfect; no one can predict when they'll go crazy
---
I'm tired of hearing the narrative that altcoins will turn around; it still depends on the project itself
---
The phrase from longevity-level believers is interesting, but there are also many who won't live that long
---
Honestly, 90% of KOLs in the market are indeed pulling the wool over people's eyes; the remaining 10% are also doing so
---
That wave of leveraged liquidation was well-deserved; who told you not to listen?
View OriginalReply0
BridgeTrustFund
· 4h ago
Wow, MASK's move was indeed outrageous... but now most people shouting about it are just armchair strategists after the fact.
The saying "human nature goes against the grain" hits too close to home; I am the perfect example of the opposite.
The fake coin turnaround still needs to wait a bit longer; the psychological shadow of cutting losses hasn't fully passed.
The logic that those who hold at the bottom will win is correct, but out of ten people who hold, nine and a half are already dead.
That KOL approach is spot on; joining the group now really feels like a money-making opportunity.
View OriginalReply0
ShortingEnthusiast
· 4h ago
Early madness and late madness—this theory is getting old. Honestly, it's just about throwing a tantrum and luck.
180,000 to 240,000? Overthinking it. Life and death are decided in a single day.
That KOL approach is truly brilliant—cutting at the bottom, pushing at the top. Retail investors are just destined to be eaten.
Copycat projects are the real chance to turn things around, but 99% of people won't see that day.
No matter how eloquently you put it, it doesn't change one fact—most people are born to be the bag holders.
It's not about early madness or late madness; it's simply a matter of having money or not. Don't blame human nature.
Can Bitcoin stabilize between 180,000 and 240,000 in Q1? There's a deeper logic behind this question.
You’ll understand instantly when comparing the growth rates of traditional assets. Gold took half a year to rise 50%, silver a month for 50%, platinum a week for 50%, palladium three days for 50%, and even tin by the roadside can surge 50% in a day. So what about cryptocurrencies? This is an incremental market, and everyone has an answer in their heart.
How did the textbook cases of the first two bull markets unfold? The performance of coins like MASK, DYDX, YGG, ICP says it all. Take MASK as an example: it opened at 0.5U and soared to 75U within a few hours that night. This is not a story of "slow growth," but a script of "all in one day."
How many people in the crypto world haven't gone crazy? The only difference is early madness versus late madness. Early mad people accumulate chips at the bottom, late mad people buy at the top. Those who are now losing more than ten times, the core issue is actually very simple: being sober at the wrong time, and crazy at the wrong time. Calm down early at the top, how could you lose like this? But human nature always works against it—that's the cruel truth.
During Ethereum's rise from a few thousand to 10,000, retail investors generally looked at 20,000. What are 90% of KOLs doing now? Recommissions, collecting tuition fees, selling emotions, selling certainty. Their underlying logic is just one sentence: they don't need you to survive long-term, only to trade frequently. So they must shout fast, shout fierce, shout certainty, create FOMO, and keep you moving.
The full network liquidation on October 11 was not an accident; disasters always strike those who are unprepared. Someone warned as early as July not to use leverage. The first wave of retail liquidation was direct zeroing, the second wave was only after the main rally. Opportunities are only for those who are prepared.
The market layering logic is very clear: Bitcoin determines whether you survive, Ethereum determines whether you are stable, and only altcoins can truly turn things around. Two years ago, when the whole network was bearish on Bitcoin, it was a bottoming process; at the end of June, when the whole network was calling Ethereum trash, it was still bottoming. Now, altcoins are being mocked and denied by the whole network, but they are doing the same thing.
Other KOLs' routines are always opposite: at the bottom, they let you cut; at the halfway point, they let you rush; the only goal is—making you unable to survive, unsteady, and unable to turn things around.
What has a three-year cycle proven? Others always say, "The market didn't die, I died." Those who follow the trend not only caught the big waves of Bitcoin and Ethereum but also became the main force that cannot be washed out no matter how the market manipulates. The main force fears not those star players, but the longevity of persistent players. This is what institutions do, and what the true market winners do.