2025-12-28 07:22:39

You are not being comprehensive enough. This topic is not just about wallets.

I am very particular about security, never writing down mnemonic phrases, and employing multiple protective measures. Using a top-tier wallet, I have never encountered asset loss.

I cannot guarantee that any wallet is absolutely secure; no matter how advanced the technology, vulnerabilities exist. But looking at the root causes of these security incidents? Most of the time, they are not due to the wallet itself, but user operations. Mnemonic phrase leaks, phishing websites, authorization abuse, improper private key management—these are the main issues.

Building a secure wallet architecture is fundamental, but user security awareness is the real line of defense. Both are indispensable.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BakedCatFanboy

· 10h ago

That's right, I share the same view. Many people blame the wallet after being hacked, but it's actually due to improper operation on their part.

View OriginalReply0

FundingMartyr

· 10h ago

This guy is right, it really is the case. After talking about wallet security for so long, users start to shoot themselves in the foot—saving screenshots of seed phrases, granting permissions randomly. Isn't this shooting themselves in the foot?

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractPlumber

· 10h ago

I completely agree. I have audited several wallet contracts before, and the real vulnerability chain is often not in the signature mechanism, but in the details of permission control. But ultimately, no matter how solid the technical architecture is, a phishing link or a casual authorization can cause everything to collapse. This is not something a wallet can save.

View OriginalReply0

DAOdreamer