Position sizing beats perfect timing—every single time. A mediocre entry with solid risk management will outperform a textbook entry with sloppy position control. Why? Because one mistake in sizing can wipe you out, while a slightly worse entry just means smaller short-term heat. What's your take—have you seen this play out in your own trades?

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Fren_Not_Foodvip
· 10h ago
To be honest, I suffered significant losses early on due to poor position management. Now I would rather miss ten opportunities than risk heavy positions casually.
View OriginalReply0
RealYieldWizardvip
· 10h ago
Position management is truly the most underrated aspect of trading. No matter how many people pursue perfect entry results, they still get liquidated, which is a loss that outweighs the gain.
View OriginalReply0
PaperHandsCriminalvip
· 10h ago
I have a lot of say in this... I once perfectly timed my entry, but ended up wiping out my position in one go. Now it's a painful lesson. Position sizing really makes all the difference.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDoomsDayvip
· 10h ago
Getting stuck on position sizing has already caused me to lose twice, really.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)