2025-12-28 07:20:55

Brothers, today let's talk about something real. By 2025, the Bitcoin ecosystem will feature numerous second-layer solutions and various application layers, some of which will multiply in value overnight, while others will disappear altogether. People's anxiety stems from this—too many follow the trend, but very few truly understand the underlying logic. And the key role that determines whether this game can continue is actually an often-overlooked project type—the oracle projects.

You see, Bitcoin, this big fish, has traditionally been lying around, simply serving as a store of value. Now it wants to become active, to do lending, trading, and all kinds of tricks on-chain. But the problem is, these operations require real-time price information, data flowing from outside sources. It's like an exchange going offline—no matter how advanced the technology, it's useless.

That's why oracles are considered the hidden trump card—they solve Bitcoin's inherent shortcomings in design. Bitcoin's network security is top-notch, but its consensus mechanism and architecture were not designed for frequent on-chain activities. Want to replicate an Ethereum-like DeFi ecosystem on Bitcoin? The first obstacle is data. How to securely, in real-time, and accurately bring external price data in without compromising Bitcoin's security? This task has an extremely high technical barrier and is not something that can be casually done.

Why hasn't the potential been fully unleashed yet? Because the demand across the entire ecosystem is just beginning to explode. Every time a new application appears in the Bitcoin ecosystem, and every new transaction generated, the demand for data services grows accordingly. This demand is not virtual or speculative—it is rigid and rooted in actual use cases. Short-term price fluctuations can be misleading, but true value growth comes from the increased business volume supported by these foundational infrastructures.

BTC-0,53%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ZKSherlock

· 21h ago

actually... the oracle problem here is way more nuanced than presented. you're conflating data availability with cryptographic proof systems, and that's where most people get lost. the real issue isn't just "getting price feeds in safely"—it's about trust assumptions baked into the architecture itself.

Reply0

LightningAllInHero

· 12-28 07:49

Oracles are indeed easy to overlook, but honestly, there are very few projects in the industry that are truly doing well. The logic makes sense, but don't demonize it; it still depends on whose data is genuinely reliable. The point about rigid demand is correct; finally someone sees it clearly, while most are still hyping concepts. Oracles are indeed infrastructure, but is the current market too competitive now? It feels like everyone is fighting for this piece of the cake. So the question is, whose oracle can truly support the explosion of Bitcoin DeFi? That’s the core issue. It still feels too early in the Bitcoin ecosystem; the demand for oracles is a real necessity, but it’s far from reaching an explosive stage. You’re right, but it’s a bit idealistic; in reality, the pitfalls of data security are much deeper than you think.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropAnxiety

· 12-28 07:46

Indeed, oracles are often overlooked, but anyone who truly understands what Bitcoin aims to do can't ignore this hurdle. My brother, your words hit the nail on the head. Data issues are really the primary bottleneck. Whether you can seize this wave of benefits depends on who can solidify this "hidden trump card." However, these days, projects claiming to build oracles are everywhere. How do you distinguish who is truly capable from those just hyping? That's the real challenge. It seems simple on the surface, but the technical barriers are real—it's not something just anyone can tackle. Wait, isn't your logic reversed? Isn't the demand explosion the true cause, rather than price-driven? Hmm, I agree with this line of thinking. The value of infrastructure lies here, but the prerequisite is actually doing the work well. Short-term price fluctuations can indeed be confusing and lead to chasing highs. To put it plainly, oracles are that invisible supply chain, more worth watching than those star projects on Layer 2. Rigid demand sounds good, but how many can truly turn it into profit? This sector feels like just the beginning. When demand really explodes, it might be too late.

View OriginalReply0

ClassicDumpster

· 12-28 07:45

Oracles are indeed easy to sleep on, but when it comes to real rigid demand, it's a different story. Honestly, nine out of ten trend-following projects are dead fish; the underlying logic is the hard currency. How many ambitious players can pass the hurdle of data security? The technical barriers are right there. Bitcoin's attempt to do DeFi is a dream, but realizing that dream still depends on the underlying infrastructure behind it.

View OriginalReply0

CoffeeNFTrader

· 12-28 07:42

Oracles have indeed been underestimated; everyone is focused on the numbers of L2, and no one is paying attention to the vital data stream. Exactly, now it's just a matter of waiting for the application explosion; only when demand rises will oracles truly become valuable. Want to play DeFi with Bitcoin? First, get the information flow sorted out; otherwise, no matter how many layers you add, it's all in vain. This article hits the point—businesses built on foundational infrastructure are the long-term bread and butter. However, with so many players in the oracle race, it's really hard to say who will survive in the end.

View OriginalReply0

YieldWhisperer

· 12-28 07:39

Oh, you're right. Oracles are indeed easy to overlook. That being said, there are still too many people chasing the trend now. They'll only realize when the explosion actually happens. It feels like a gamble on who can actually get this system running smoothly; not all teams can do it.

View OriginalReply0

ProposalManiac

· 12-28 07:36

Oracles are indeed often underestimated, but to be honest... mechanism design is the core. How to prevent witch attacks and ensure incentive compatibility in decentralized data feeds—these issues still haven't been fully resolved by 2025.

View OriginalReply0