Looking at the performance of this project, claiming to give up suddenly and actually giving up—who can believe that? Every day, retail investors are repeatedly educated by the market makers, and retail funds are being worn down round after round. Instead of continuing to waste time, it's better to exit early and look for other opportunities to recover the losses.
Behind the project team's actions, they openly say there are no insider operations, but how can this logic be convincing? From promises worth billions to now a complete abandonment attitude, the change happened so quickly. Is the story really that simple?
What do you all think about this? Has anyone experienced a similar project?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ProtocolRebel
· 15h ago
Here we go again with the same old story, from promises to giving up, moving so fast it’s like a Flash skill
---
Retail investors are always the last to know. Where are the multi-billion promises?
---
I just want to know, how much did we lose this time to learn our lesson
---
Don’t try to fool with “no inside info,” this plot twist is way too abrupt
---
The problem has been obvious for a while. Now those wanting to get out have to queue up
---
The project team’s attitude... is just ridiculous, are they just going to turn around and run?
---
Having gone through this twice, it’s always the same routine with a different mask
---
How can a multi-billion promise just disappear like that? So arbitrary
---
Instead of waiting for death, better to cut losses quickly. There are definitely more traps waiting
---
Logical consistency? Bro, you’re asking for too much
---
I’ve never seen a project team so straightforward in admitting to giving up; they all just die slowly
View OriginalReply0
RugPullSurvivor
· 15h ago
If I had known earlier, I would have sold off and run at the first sign of trouble. Now I'm completely亏到麻了
The manipulators keep educating us, right? We retail investors are just cheap lives, it's true.
Billions of promises turn into scams; I've seen this routine too many times. Wake up, everyone.
The project team says there's no insider information, and I just laugh. Do they really think we're all fools?
Same tricks, same being cut off. This circle is just like this.
Compared to waiting, admitting losses and cutting losses early is the smarter choice.
Where is the promised vision? How did it turn into a pie in the sky? Ridiculous.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter420
· 15h ago
It's the same old trick again. Promising billions, then suddenly giving up. Truly unbelievable.
The manipulators are playing tricks in the market, and retail investors' hard-earned money is just being taken away.
Better to run early and not wait to be repeatedly educated.
Who would believe a project team that claims there's no insider information? It's hilarious.
I've been through it too. Ended up losing everything. Now I see this kind of thing, I just run away immediately.
Looking at the performance of this project, claiming to give up suddenly and actually giving up—who can believe that? Every day, retail investors are repeatedly educated by the market makers, and retail funds are being worn down round after round. Instead of continuing to waste time, it's better to exit early and look for other opportunities to recover the losses.
Behind the project team's actions, they openly say there are no insider operations, but how can this logic be convincing? From promises worth billions to now a complete abandonment attitude, the change happened so quickly. Is the story really that simple?
What do you all think about this? Has anyone experienced a similar project?