This project continuously burns tokens, which in theory should support the price, but the market performance has not kept up, which is indeed somewhat illogical. Compared to other projects in the same series that have already reached a market cap of several million, the valuation gap for Yellow Ball is still quite apparent.
The burn mechanism is well-designed, but the issue may be that the market has not fully recognized this value point yet. Many people haven't paid attention to the details of the tokenomics and only focus on short-term fluctuations. Once the market discovers this underlying value logic, a rebound often follows.
From a risk-reward perspective, the current position is worth paying attention to. The earlier projects in the same series have already validated the feasibility of the model. If Yellow Ball can catch up later, there is still room for imagination. You can start by allocating a portion and wait for market recognition to iterate.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Liquidated_Larry
· 3h ago
What’s the point of burning? Just burning coins alone can make the price go up? The market isn’t that naive.
Wait, this logic seems to make some sense... Could it really be a trap?
But I still think it depends on the moves of the whales. No matter how awesome the mechanism is, if no one is trading, it’s useless.
Try some small-scale ambushes; anyway, it won’t be worse than that project I was involved in last time.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeJumper
· 13h ago
The destruction mechanism has been exaggerated. Now everyone is doing burns, and users don't really care.
By the time the rebound happens, the price will be far from where it is now, brother.
Market cap lowland? Nice words. I just ask why other projects can reach millions, but this one can't.
Start by allocating a part... Every project says this, but what’s the result?
Tokenomics can't change the fact that human greed is innate.
View OriginalReply0
RebaseVictim
· 13h ago
Destroying so many tokens and still seeing a decline, it feels a bit disappointing...
Wait, are all the other series already worth millions? Why is the yellow ball still in the trough?
No one cares about tokenomics anymore; everyone is just chasing short-term gains and drops. Truly speechless.
I believe the market will eventually respond; the question is when...
But if you enter now, you need to be prepared for the long term.
View OriginalReply0
Layer2Observer
· 13h ago
Burning ≠ Price Increase. Be cautious of this logical trap. Market perception iteration sounds good, but frankly, it's still a gamble on whether newcomers can break through.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightMEVeater
· 13h ago
Good morning, I am here at 2 a.m. I've heard the argument about destruction so many times that it has become the prelude to a liquidity trap.
Is the price not keeping up with the destruction speed? That's not a dip; that's the market voting with its feet.
Waiting for a rebound... Just waiting won't produce anything. The real arbitrage opportunities have already been eaten up by sandwich attacks.
View OriginalReply0
RektDetective
· 13h ago
The destruction logic is right here, and the price remains unchanged. This is the most worth studying aspect.
The entire series has taken off, but the yellow ball is just staying put. Is this really the moment to pick up bargains? Or is there some problem we haven't seen?
Waiting for the market to wake up? I'm tired of hearing that phrase. By the time it wakes up, it won't be cheap anymore.
View OriginalReply0
ContractHunter
· 13h ago
Burning is burning, but the key is having someone to take over. Reducing supply alone without enthusiasm is pointless.
Wait, this logic sounds a bit familiar... Several projects used this same rhetoric before, and what happened in the end?
It's indeed a valuation lowland, but you know, lowlands can sometimes stay low forever.
This project continuously burns tokens, which in theory should support the price, but the market performance has not kept up, which is indeed somewhat illogical. Compared to other projects in the same series that have already reached a market cap of several million, the valuation gap for Yellow Ball is still quite apparent.
The burn mechanism is well-designed, but the issue may be that the market has not fully recognized this value point yet. Many people haven't paid attention to the details of the tokenomics and only focus on short-term fluctuations. Once the market discovers this underlying value logic, a rebound often follows.
From a risk-reward perspective, the current position is worth paying attention to. The earlier projects in the same series have already validated the feasibility of the model. If Yellow Ball can catch up later, there is still room for imagination. You can start by allocating a portion and wait for market recognition to iterate.