The iterative optimization of the Ultron strategy truly demonstrates positive feedback effects. This year, it underwent an important adjustment, especially the change at the end of February — we redesigned the logic of phased position building, allowing the position to adapt flexibly based on real-time market conditions. The results are clear: the net value trend has become more stable, with a significant reduction in volatility, and the entire curve shows a steady upward trajectory. This optimization approach is worth paying attention to; although parameter adjustments may seem like details, their impact on the long-term return curve is profound.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SerumSurfer
· 13h ago
The logic of building positions in batches has truly paid off; the net value curve is now completely different.
View OriginalReply0
zkProofInThePudding
· 13h ago
The February adjustment was indeed fierce, and building positions in batches is really reliable. But to be fair, can slight parameter tuning really make such a significant difference? We'll only know in the long run.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothing
· 13h ago
The February correction definitely has some substance. I need to study the logic of building positions in batches a bit more.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightTrader
· 13h ago
Hey, these detailed adjustments were definitely worth the effort. The convergence of fluctuations is noticeable.
I agree that parameter fine-tuning works... but it's a good thing that the net value curve is stable. I'm just worried that a market black swan might come later and slap us in the face.
The logic of building positions in batches is indeed meticulous, but honestly, it depends on how it performs over the long term. We can't just look at a few months of data and blow it up.
The logic changed at the end of the month is indeed quite stable. It would be great if we can stick to this pace.
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyBro
· 13h ago
The logic of building positions in batches is indeed interesting, but is the convergence of volatility real or just good-looking data? We need to observe for a while longer before drawing a conclusion.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerAirdrop
· 13h ago
The changes in February definitely made a difference, and the phased approach to building positions was adjusted quite meticulously. But to be honest, parameter optimization is a bit like mysticism... Can it really be sustained?
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonk
· 13h ago
The logic of building positions in batches really shows the way, and the point about volatility converging hit home for me.
The iterative optimization of the Ultron strategy truly demonstrates positive feedback effects. This year, it underwent an important adjustment, especially the change at the end of February — we redesigned the logic of phased position building, allowing the position to adapt flexibly based on real-time market conditions. The results are clear: the net value trend has become more stable, with a significant reduction in volatility, and the entire curve shows a steady upward trajectory. This optimization approach is worth paying attention to; although parameter adjustments may seem like details, their impact on the long-term return curve is profound.